-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
experimental matchers for integration testing #1653
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]>
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ var _ = Describe("rpcutil agent", func() { | |||
It("Should fetch correct collective info", func() { | |||
res, err := rpcutilClient.OptionTargets([]string{"localhost"}).CollectiveInfo().Do(ctx) | |||
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred()) | |||
Expect(res.Stats().OKCount()).To(Equal(1)) | |||
Expect(res).To(HaveOnlySuccessfulResponses()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vjanelle this is what I was talking about on slack, give me some more ideas of what you want to be testable and I can see.
Ultimately I want to expand this out enough that I can stand up a infra using docker compose and write integration tests against that asserting things like did all servers get correctly provisioned etc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other things I am just kind of thinking about - for the context of testing a deployed infra
- ✅
HaveDiscoverableNodes(count)
- discovers using the generated rpc client and asserts against them HaveOutputWithValue(output, key, value)
- takes any generated client result looking for key and val, those found withres.AllOutputs()
, I might add some accessors to find more like by name or somethingHaveAllOutputsWithValue(res, key, value)
- loops all the outputs and checks they all have the same key and value, this from any generated client reply
If I can't make this work - or I dont want to require generics - we could look at a generic thing like
Expect(RPC("agent", "action", input, filter)).To(HaveAllRepliesWithValue(key, value)
or
res,err:=RPC("agent", "action", input, filter)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccured())
Expect(res).To(HaveAllRepliesWithValue(key, value)
ie. a small RPC caller helper that doesnt use the generated client - this for testing agents. But I suspect you want to test the clients right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An alternative approach would be to add an assert
package to each generated client with things like:
package assert
import (
"testing"
"github.com/choria-io/go-choria/client/rpcutilclient"
)
type StatsProvider interface {
Stats() rpcutilclient.Stats
}
func HaveUnexpectedResponders(t *testing.T, res StatsProvider, count int) {
ur := len(res.Stats().UnexpectedResponseFrom())
switch {
case count < 0:
if ur == 0 {
t.Fatalf("Expected >0 unexpected responders")
}
case count == 0:
if ur > 0 {
t.Fatalf("Expected no unexpected responders")
}
default:
if ur != count {
t.Fatalf("Expected %d unexpected responders but had %d", count, ur)
}
}
}
res, _ := rpcutilClient.AgentInventory().Do(ctx)
assert.HaveUnexpectedResponders(t, res, 0)
This would be usable in any testing framework for go and less casting and weird stuff since it would just use the package internals?
I could even put this in the package directory as AssertHaveUnexpectedResponders()
(ie. not on the instance) since then it would have access to the private variables in the client, I think I quite like this it avoids having to pollute the clients with weird accessors
Signed-off-by: R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: R.I.Pienaar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: R.I.Pienaar [email protected]