Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix quotation mark #4159

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

taozui472
Copy link

No description provided.

@taozui472 taozui472 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 25, 2024 03:38
@taozui472 taozui472 requested review from cmwaters and evan-forbes and removed request for a team December 25, 2024 03:38
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to two files: an architectural decision record (ADR) document and a configuration file. The ADR document adr-006-non-interactive-defaults.md undergoes significant refinement, focusing on clarifying the implementation of non-interactive defaults in blockchain transactions. The changes enhance the document's readability, provide more detailed explanations of technical processes, and elaborate on the implementation details of share commitments and transaction processing.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/architecture/adr-006-non-interactive-defaults.md Comprehensive revision of the document, improving clarity on non-interactive defaults, transaction message inclusion, and implementation details
local_devnet/celestia-app/config.toml Updated comments in the consensus timeout section, replacing curly quotes with straight quotes

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Validator
    participant Block
    participant Transaction
    participant ShareCommitment

    Validator->>Block: Recreate share commitments
    Block->>Transaction: Extract MsgPayForBlob
    Transaction->>ShareCommitment: Verify subtree roots
    ShareCommitment-->>Validator: Validate message inclusion
Loading

This sequence diagram illustrates the high-level process of message inclusion checks in blockchain transactions, highlighting the validator's role in recreating share commitments and verifying transaction details.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/architecture/adr-006-non-interactive-defaults.md (1)

Line range hint 138-177: Consider adding error handling for edge cases in calculateSubTreeRootCoordinates.

The function assumes that end >= start and that end doesn't exceed the tree depth, but it should handle these cases gracefully with proper error messages.

 def calculateSubTreeRootCoordinates(maxDepth, start, end uint64) []coord {
+    if end < start {
+        raise ValueError("end must be greater than or equal to start")
+    }
+    if end >= (1 << maxDepth) {
+        raise ValueError("end exceeds the range of the tree depth")
+    }
     ...
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~24-~24: Possible subject-verb agreement error detected.
Context: ...ut optional** message layout rules that enables the user to follow the above block vali...

(PLURAL_THAT_AGREEMENT)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...nts to messages can consist entirely of sub-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-t...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-tree roots are to be generated only from the...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/architecture/adr-006-non-interactive-defaults.md (3)

24-24: Fix grammar and spelling in the documentation.

The text has some minor issues:

  1. Subject-verb agreement: "rules that enables" should be "rules that enable"
  2. Compound word spelling: "sub-tree" should be "subtree" for consistency with the codebase
-To fix this, the spec outlines the "non-interactive default rules". These involve a few additional **default but optional** message layout rules that enables the user to follow the above block validity rule, while also not interacting with a block producer. Commitments to messages can consist entirely of sub-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-tree roots are to be generated only from the message itself (so that the user can sign something "non-interactively").
+To fix this, the spec outlines the "non-interactive default rules". These involve a few additional **default but optional** message layout rules that enable the user to follow the above block validity rule, while also not interacting with a block producer. Commitments to messages can consist entirely of subtree roots of the data hash, and those subtree roots are to be generated only from the message itself (so that the user can sign something "non-interactively").
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~24-~24: Possible subject-verb agreement error detected.
Context: ...ut optional** message layout rules that enables the user to follow the above block vali...

(PLURAL_THAT_AGREEMENT)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...nts to messages can consist entirely of sub-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-t...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-tree roots are to be generated only from the...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)


Line range hint 180-196: Consider adding thread-safety to EDSSubTreeRootCacher.

The current implementation is not thread-safe due to the shared counter. Consider using sync.Mutex or atomic operations to make it thread-safe.

 type EDSSubTreeRootCacher struct {
+    mu        sync.Mutex
     caches     []*subTreeRootCacher
     squareSize uint64
     counter    int
 }

 func (stc *EDSSubTreeRootCacher) Constructor() rsmt2d.Tree {
+    stc.mu.Lock()
+    defer stc.mu.Unlock()
     ...
 }
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~24-~24: Possible subject-verb agreement error detected.
Context: ...ut optional** message layout rules that enables the user to follow the above block vali...

(PLURAL_THAT_AGREEMENT)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...nts to messages can consist entirely of sub-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-t...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-tree roots are to be generated only from the...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)


Line range hint 267-290: Consider adding metrics for block space utilization.

Since non-interactive defaults can lead to wasted square space, it would be valuable to track metrics about block space utilization to help optimize the implementation.

Consider adding Prometheus metrics to track:

  1. Percentage of wasted space per block
  2. Average message size vs padded size
  3. Distribution of message alignments
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~24-~24: Possible subject-verb agreement error detected.
Context: ...ut optional** message layout rules that enables the user to follow the above block vali...

(PLURAL_THAT_AGREEMENT)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...nts to messages can consist entirely of sub-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-t...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-tree roots are to be generated only from the...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 05d1acd and cfad5cf.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/architecture/adr-006-non-interactive-defaults.md (1 hunks)
  • local_devnet/celestia-app/config.toml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • local_devnet/celestia-app/config.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/architecture/adr-006-non-interactive-defaults.md

[grammar] ~24-~24: Possible subject-verb agreement error detected.
Context: ...ut optional** message layout rules that enables the user to follow the above block vali...

(PLURAL_THAT_AGREEMENT)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...nts to messages can consist entirely of sub-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-t...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)


[misspelling] ~24-~24: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...-tree roots of the data hash, and those sub-tree roots are to be generated only from the...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_SUB_TREE)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant