-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: type BubbleProps.messageRender #403
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough变更概览步骤说明在 变更
对链接问题的评估
可能相关的 PR
建议的审阅者
诗歌庆祝
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
WalkthroughThis pull request refactors the Changes
|
content?: React.ReactNode | object; | ||
messageRender?: (content: string) => React.ReactNode; | ||
content?: BubbleContentType; | ||
messageRender?: (content: BubbleContentType) => React.ReactNode; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure that messageRender
function handles both React.ReactNode
and object
types appropriately, as this change allows for more complex content structures. Consider adding type checks or validations if necessary.
Bundle ReportChanges will decrease total bundle size by 334 bytes (-0.21%) ⬇️. This is within the configured threshold ✅ Detailed changes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/bubble/interface.ts (1)
20-20
: 建议为对象类型提供更详细的结构或类型定义
使用object
可能会导致类型检查不够严谨,影响可维护性与可读性。若后续需要在逻辑中对该对象做更细节的操作,建议定义更明确的数据结构或使用泛型来强化类型安全。
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/bubble/interface.ts
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/bubble/interface.ts (2)
31-31
: 将 content
包装为统一类型利于后续扩展
将 content
的类型用别名抽象,统一了内容的处理方式,便于进行拓展或维护,值得肯定。
32-32
: 更新 messageRender
参数类型后需注意内部逻辑处理
messageRender
现在支持接收 React.ReactNode | object
。在使用中若需要区分处理对象与节点,可能需要做额外的类型保护或类型断言。
size-limit report 📦
|
Deploying ant-design-x with Cloudflare Pages
|
fix: #400
Summary by CodeRabbit
BubbleContentType
,增强了内容和消息渲染属性的类型清晰度和一致性。