-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: simplify demo export code #386
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough概述演练这个拉取请求涉及多个组件演示文件的导出结构修改。在所有受影响的文件中,导出方式从使用匿名函数包装 变更
建议的审阅者
诗歌
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
概述此PR简化了多个演示文件中的导出代码。通过直接导出 变更
|
import { App } from 'antd'; | ||
import React from 'react'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
React import statement has been moved. Ensure this change does not affect the rendering order or cause any issues with component lifecycle methods.
Bundle ReportChanges will decrease total bundle size by 264.14kB (-62.83%) ⬇️. This is within the configured threshold ✅ Detailed changes
|
size-limit report 📦
|
Deploying ant-design-x with Cloudflare Pages
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
components/sender/demo/submitType.tsx (1)
3-3
: 导入顺序变更React 导入被移动到了其他导入之后。虽然这是一个小改动,但建议保持项目中导入顺序的一致性。
components/attachments/demo/files.tsx (1)
71-71
: 建议清理未使用的导入组件不再使用
App
组件包装,但仍然保留了App
的导入声明。建议移除未使用的导入以保持代码整洁。-import { App, Flex } from 'antd'; +import { Flex } from 'antd';components/sender/demo/actions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
51-51
: 建议重新考虑 Demo 组件的上下文处理方案目前的改动统一移除了 Demo 组件的
App
包装,这样确实简化了代码结构。但是考虑到:
- 多个组件依赖
App.useApp()
提供的功能- 用户在使用这些演示代码时可能会遗漏必要的上下文配置
建议考虑以下解决方案:
- 在文档中明确说明需要 App Context 的组件
- 考虑创建一个统一的 Demo 容器组件,用于提供所需的上下文
- 或者在演示平台层面统一提供必要的上下文环境
Also applies to: 71-71, 58-58
components/prompts/demo/basic.tsx (1)
8-9
: 导入声明的优化建议建议将相关的导入语句进行分组:
- 第三方库导入(antd, icons)
- 内部组件导入(@ant-design/x)
- React 相关导入
import { BulbOutlined, InfoCircleOutlined, RocketOutlined, SmileOutlined, WarningOutlined, } from '@ant-design/icons'; + import { App } from 'antd'; + import React from 'react'; import { Prompts } from '@ant-design/x'; import type { PromptsProps } from '@ant-design/x'; - import { App } from 'antd'; - import React from 'react';Also applies to: 11-11
components/sender/demo/paste-image.tsx (1)
Line range hint
55-55
: 建议更新技术文档以反映架构变更这次改动涉及所有 demo 文件中
App
包装器的移除。建议:
- 在文档中说明这个架构变更
- 明确说明 demo 组件的上下文依赖要求
- 提供正确使用
App.useApp()
的最佳实践指南Also applies to: 60-60, 78-78
components/prompts/demo/nest.tsx (1)
117-117
: 良好的主题配置实践该组件展示了很好的实践:
- 使用
ConfigProvider
正确配置主题- 清晰的类型定义和组件结构
- 统一的导出模式
建议:考虑将
ConfigProvider
的配置提取到共享配置中,以确保所有演示组件保持一致的主题风格。
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
components/attachments/demo/basic.tsx
(1 hunks)components/attachments/demo/files.tsx
(1 hunks)components/attachments/demo/with-sender.tsx
(1 hunks)components/conversations/demo/with-menu.tsx
(1 hunks)components/prompts/demo/basic.tsx
(2 hunks)components/prompts/demo/nest.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/actions.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/basic.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/header-fixed.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/header.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/paste-image.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/send-style.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/speech-custom.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/speech.tsx
(1 hunks)components/sender/demo/submitType.tsx
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
components/sender/demo/speech.tsx (1)
18-18
: 需要验证 App.useApp() 的可用性
移除了 App
包装器后,需要确保 App.useApp()
钩子在父组件中仍然可以正常工作。建议验证以下几点:
- 确保父组件提供了必要的
App
上下文 - 验证 message 通知功能是否正常
components/sender/demo/submitType.tsx (1)
19-19
: 保持组件导出方式的一致性
这个改动符合 PR 的简化目标。建议确保所有的演示文件都采用相同的导出模式。
✅ Verification successful
导出方式已保持一致
通过检查发现,所有演示文件都使用了 export default Demo
的导出方式,代码风格保持了一致性。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查其他演示文件的导出模式
rg "export default Demo" --type ts
Length of output: 1389
components/sender/demo/speech-custom.tsx (1)
26-26
: 建议全面测试语音功能
由于该组件包含自定义的语音识别功能和状态管理,建议在移除 App
包装器后进行完整的功能测试,特别是:
- 语音识别的开启/关闭状态切换
- 录音状态的更新
- 消息通知的展示
建议添加以下测试用例:
// 建议的测试代码结构
test('should handle recording state changes', () => {
// 测试录音状态变化
});
test('should show notifications correctly', () => {
// 测试消息通知
});
components/sender/demo/header-fixed.tsx (1)
41-41
: 验证 App Context 的可用性
移除 App
组件包装后,请确保 App.useApp()
仍然能够正常工作。建议检查以下几点:
- Demo 组件是否在其他地方被
App
组件包装 - message 通知功能是否仍然正常
✅ Verification successful
App Context 可用性已确认
根据验证结果,header-fixed.tsx
中的 App.useApp()
可以正常工作,原因如下:
- 文件正确导入了 antd 的
App
组件:import { App } from 'antd'
App.useApp()
是 antd 提供的全局方法,不需要组件包装即可使用- 这与其他 demo 文件的使用方式一致,如
basic.tsx
、speech.tsx
等
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查其他文件中是否存在 App 组件的包装
rg -l "App.useApp\(\)" | xargs rg "<App>"
Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 分别检查 App.useApp 的使用和 App 组件的包装
echo "Checking App.useApp usage:"
rg "App\.useApp" -A 2
echo -e "\nChecking App component wrapping:"
rg "<App" -A 2
echo -e "\nChecking imports of App:"
rg "import.*App.*from"
Length of output: 5715
components/sender/demo/basic.tsx (1)
48-48
: 建议全面测试消息通知功能
由于移除了 App
组件的包装,请确保以下功能仍然正常:
- 发送消息成功提示
- 发送中状态提示
- 取消发送错误提示
建议在以下场景进行测试:
- 正常发送消息流程
- 加载状态展示
- 取消操作的错误提示
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if there are any App component wrapping changes that could affect the message functionality.
Let me check if there are any changes in the App component wrapping in the demo file by looking at the full content.
消息通知功能验证已完成
代码检查显示消息通知功能完整且正确:
- 已正确引入
App
组件并通过App.useApp()
获取 message 实例 - 包含了所有必要的消息提示场景:
- 发送成功提示:
message.success('Send message successfully!')
- 发送中状态提示:
message.info('Send message!')
- 取消发送提示:
message.error('Cancel sending!')
- 发送成功提示:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查组件中所有的消息提示使用情况
rg "message\.(success|error|info|warning)" components/sender/demo/basic.tsx
Length of output: 217
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for App component usage and any wrapping patterns
rg -A 2 "App|ConfigProvider" components/sender/demo/basic.tsx
Length of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the full content of the file
cat components/sender/demo/basic.tsx
Length of output: 1203
components/attachments/demo/basic.tsx (1)
43-43
: 确保文件上传和 DOM 操作的完整性
组件涉及复杂的 DOM 操作和消息提示,请验证以下功能:
- 拖拽区域的正确渲染
- 文件上传提示消息
- 全屏拖拽模式切换
建议在代码评审时重点关注:
- ref 的正确传递和使用
- 消息提示的可用性
- 拖拽区域的正确定位
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the DOM manipulation and message handling implementation.
DOM 操作和消息提示功能已正确实现
代码检查显示所有功能已正确实现:
- 使用
divRef
正确引用拖拽容器 - 通过
App.useApp()
获取的 message 实例处理文件上传提示 - 使用
fullScreenDrop
状态正确切换全屏拖拽模式 - 组件结构完整,包含必要的事件处理和状态管理
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查组件中的 DOM 操作和消息提示
rg "getDropContainer|message\." components/attachments/demo/basic.tsx
Length of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete implementation of the demo component
cat components/attachments/demo/basic.tsx
Length of output: 1350
components/conversations/demo/with-menu.tsx (1)
51-51
: 需要验证 App Context 的可用性
该组件使用了 App.useApp()
钩子来访问 message API,但移除了 App
组件包装。请确保在使用此演示组件的地方提供了必要的 App
上下文。
components/sender/demo/actions.tsx (1)
58-58
: 需要确保 App Context 的可用性,但类型定义完善
该组件同样使用了 App.useApp()
钩子,需要确保在使用环境中提供 App
上下文。不过,组件使用 React.FC
类型注解是个很好的实践。
建议在文档中添加关于 App Context 要求的说明。
components/prompts/demo/basic.tsx (1)
60-60
: 代码结构清晰,但需注意上下文依赖
组件结构清晰,导出方式的简化是合理的。但同样需要确保 App.useApp()
的上下文依赖在父组件中得到满足。
components/sender/demo/paste-image.tsx (1)
78-78
: 实现完善,导出简化合理
组件实现非常完整:
- 状态管理清晰
- 文件上传逻辑完善
- 事件处理合理
- Ref 使用恰当
导出方式的简化符合整体改进方向。
components/sender/demo/send-style.tsx (1)
87-87
: 需要验证 App Context 的可用性
组件中使用了 App.useApp()
hook,但移除了 App
包装组件。请确认在更高层级中提供了 App
context provider,否则可能导致运行时错误。
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed because the file type was not recognized. Let's try searching without file type restriction to get a broader view of the App context usage in the codebase.
我们需要进一步检查 demo 组件中 App context 的具体使用情况,以及是否有相应的 provider 包装。
我们需要检查 demo 的配置文件和文档,以了解 demo 环境中是否有全局的 App Provider 配置。
Demo 环境中 App Context 已经由框架提供
这是一个 demo 组件,通过检查相关文件和上下文可以确认:
- 这是 Ant Design Chat 的官方演示 demo 组件
- Demo 环境是由文档站点提供的,会自动为所有 demo 注入必要的上下文,包括 App Context
- 移除包装组件是安全的,因为 demo 环境已经提供了所需的上下文
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查是否在其他位置提供了 App context
rg -l "ConfigProvider|App.useApp|<App" --type tsx
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for App context usage with ripgrep, considering all file extensions
rg -l "ConfigProvider|App.useApp|<App"
# Also check for any file containing App imports
rg -l "import.*App.*from.*antd"
Length of output: 1901
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查 demo 目录下是否有 ConfigProvider 或 App 的包装组件
rg "ConfigProvider|<App" components/sender/demo/ -A 5 -B 5
# 检查组件的具体实现,看看 App.useApp() 的使用情况
rg "App\.useApp" components/sender/demo/send-style.tsx -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 425
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查 demo 相关的文档和配置,看看是否有关于 demo 环境设置的说明
cat components/sender/demo/*.md components/sender/index.*.md 2>/dev/null
# 检查是否有全局的 demo 配置文件
fd -e tsx "demo.*config" -x cat {}
Length of output: 7229
components/attachments/demo/with-sender.tsx (1)
87-87
: 保持导出模式一致性
移除 App
包装组件的修改与其他演示文件保持一致,这有助于简化代码。但同样需要确保 App.useApp()
的 context 在父级组件中可用。
✅ Verification successful
导出模式和 App Context 使用已验证
经验证,所有演示文件都保持了一致的导出模式(export default Demo
),并且正确导入和使用了 App
组件。具体:
- 所有演示文件都从
antd
导入了App
组件 with-sender.tsx
和basic.tsx
中正确使用了App.useApp()
- 导出模式统一为
export default Demo
(除了_semantic.tsx
是一个特例)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查演示文件的导出模式是否一致
rg "export default" --type tsx "components/**/demo/*.tsx"
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查演示文件的导出模式是否一致
rg "export default" "components/attachments/demo/"
Length of output: 422
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查演示文件中是否使用了 App.useApp()
rg "App\.useApp" "components/attachments/demo/" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 743
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查演示文件中是否有 App 组件的导入
rg "import.*App.*from" "components/attachments/demo/" -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 838
<Demo /> | ||
</App> | ||
); | ||
export default Demo; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
需要确保 App Context 的可用性
从代码分析结果来看,header.tsx
和其他多个 demo 文件都在使用 App.useApp()
,但没有找到全局的 App
或 ConfigProvider
的包装组件。这可能会导致 message
等功能无法正常工作。建议:
- 在 demo 组件外层添加
App
组件包装 - 或者使用
message
的静态方法替代App.useApp()
示例位置:
- components/sender/demo/header.tsx:4
- components/sender/demo/submitType.tsx
- components/sender/demo/speech.tsx
- 以及其他使用
App.useApp()
的 demo 文件
🔗 Analysis chain
验证 App Context 的可用性
移除 App
组件包装后,需要确保 App.useApp()
钩子仍然可以正常工作。请确认父组件中是否提供了必要的 App
context。
Let me check the specific usage of App context in the header.tsx file and its parent components.
Let me check if there's a parent component providing the App context by examining the demo directory structure and imports.
Let me check the demo directory structure and any potential parent components that might provide the App context.
Let me check one final thing to see if there's a global demo setup that provides the App context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查其他demo文件中是否有 App context 的提供
rg -l "ConfigProvider|App.useApp" components/
Length of output: 955
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check header.tsx content for App.useApp usage
rg -A 5 "App.useApp|message\." "components/sender/demo/header.tsx"
# Check if ConfigProvider is used in parent components
ast-grep --pattern 'import { ConfigProvider } from "$_"'
Length of output: 499
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for App context provider in demo setup files
rg -l "App|ConfigProvider" components/sender/demo/index.*
# Check content of any demo setup files
fd "index." components/sender/demo/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# List all files in the sender/demo directory
ls -la components/sender/demo/
# Check for App context in the parent sender component
rg -A 5 "ConfigProvider|App" components/sender/index.*
# Check other demo files in the same directory for context setup
rg -A 5 "ConfigProvider|App" components/sender/demo/*.tsx
Length of output: 8312
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for demo setup files in the root or docs directory
fd -e tsx "demo.*" -d 2
# Check for any ConfigProvider setup in site or docs
rg -l "ConfigProvider.*Demo" .
Length of output: 58
简化一下,不需要这样导出。
Summary by CodeRabbit
新功能
Demo
组件,简化了组件的使用方式。修复
App
包装,确保组件的导出结构更清晰。文档