-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ISO23150 compliance: Adding new states to [StationaryObject – Classification - Type] #641
Comments
I'm a bit confused why TYPE_VERTICAL_STRUCTURE and TYPE_RECTANGULAR_STRUCTURE occur in this list, since they are verbatim already part of OSI's definition. Similarly TYPE_LAMP_POST, TYPE_OVERHEAD_OBJECT, TYPE_REFLECTOR, and TYPE_BEACON are already present as TYPE_POLE, TYPE_OVERHEAD_STRUCTURE, TYPE_REFLECTIVE_STRUCTURE, and TYPE_CONSTRUCTION_SITE_ELEMENT. TYPE_TUNNEL and TYPE_GUIDE_POST might be additions, though I seem to remember discussions to handle them differently... TYPE_BARREL seems a fairly clear addition. |
Thats correct, I will change this. |
New elements: BARREL, GUIDE_POST, TUNNEL Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641
New elements: BARREL, GUIDE_POST, TUNNEL Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641 Signed-off-by: FlorianMueller87 <[email protected]>
Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641 Signed-off-by: FlorianMueller87 <[email protected]>
New elements: BARREL, GUIDE_POST, TUNNEL Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641 Signed-off-by: FlorianMueller87 <[email protected]>
Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641 Signed-off-by: FlorianMueller87 <[email protected]>
New elements: BARREL, GUIDE_POST, TUNNEL Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641 Signed-off-by: FlorianMueller87 <[email protected]>
Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641 Signed-off-by: FlorianMueller87 <[email protected]>
New elements: BARREL, GUIDE_POST, TUNNEL Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641 Signed-off-by: FlorianMueller87 <[email protected]>
Issue: OpenSimulationInterface#641 Signed-off-by: FlorianMueller87 <[email protected]>
Describe the feature
ASAM OSI and ISO 23150 or AUTOSAR ADI have a common history. Unfortunately, the inner structure, the naming and the definitions of the standards are differentiated from each other. This makes the work of developers unnecessary complicated for mostly no technical reasons. All sides should strive to reduce inequality.
ASAM OSI need the entries for osi_objects – StationaryObject – Classification - Type to be compatible with AUTOSAR ADI GeneralLandmarkClassificationType.
Describe the solution you would like
Add in osi_objects – StationaryObject – Classification - Type the following entries:
//
//
TYPE_ BARREL = 17;
//
//
TYPE_ GUIDE_POST = 18;
//
//
TYPE_ TUNNEL = 19;
Describe alternatives you have considered
No alternative was considered.
Describe the backwards compatibility
The adding of the elements will not lead to backward compatibility issues.
Additional context
ISO23150:2021 A.2.105 General landmark classification type
@ThomasNaderBMW @jdsika @schmidtlorenz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: