Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revised Grouping Logic #76

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2024
Merged

Revised Grouping Logic #76

merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2024

Conversation

Sohambutala
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #74: Revised grouping logic by introducing the grouping_regex option, allowing users to define a regex pattern for deriving group names from filenames. If grouping_regex is not specified, the code checks for a group_name (default group name) parameter and adds files under that group. If neither is defined, the code uses complete filenames as group names and adds files accordingly.

@Sohambutala Sohambutala self-assigned this May 7, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@valentina-s valentina-s left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried with the combined MVBS on more files from the 2017 transect annotations and it works well for the subgroups. We most probably do not need the individual subfolders after combine for the survey, but could leave them for now to keep the structure. More examples and explanation of the different scenarios would help.

@Sohambutala Sohambutala merged commit 4e686be into main May 14, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Grouping Issue with TRANSECT_FILE_REGEX
2 participants