Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compiled tweaks from old codex dump branch. #4681

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2024

Conversation

MistakeNot4892
Copy link
Contributor

Cleaning up old branches, there were a couple of small changes in my working copy that I missed when I got it merged to main apparently.

@MistakeNot4892 MistakeNot4892 added the ready for review This PR is ready for review and merge. label Dec 27, 2024
Copy link
Member

@out-of-phaze out-of-phaze left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well i sure hope they've been compiled! (joke)

if((B && !QDELETED(B)) || (!B && target_turf?.is_wall()))
neighbors |= look_dir
if(target_turf)
var/obj/structure/tape_barricade/B = locate(/obj/structure/tape_barricade, target_turf)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
var/obj/structure/tape_barricade/B = locate(/obj/structure/tape_barricade, target_turf)
var/obj/structure/tape_barricade/B = locate(/obj/structure/tape_barricade) in target_turf

uhhhh. i don't know if the original syntax is valid or not but it definitely gives me the heebie-jeebies. please change it and i will get around to changing the other cases of this also

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's valid syntax, but I'll tweak it.

@out-of-phaze out-of-phaze merged commit fb11510 into NebulaSS13:dev Dec 29, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready for review This PR is ready for review and merge.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants