Align DKMS package name with RPM spec

[cartermckinnon]

The RPM spec for the kernel module DKMS package uses nvidia-open as the package name, but the dkms.conf in this repository uses nvidia.

If you:

yum install https://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/repos/rhel7/x86_64/kmod-nvidia-open-dkms-545.23.06-1.el7.x86_64.rpm

Then you end up with a package in your DKMS tree called nvidia-open because of this: https://github.com/NVIDIA/yum-packaging-dkms-nvidia/blob/b28ed69631673c076b797caeec5fd83c452a6f61/dkms-open-nvidia.spec#L2C9-L2C18

If you mktarball and ldtarball that package, it becomes nvidia.

[aritger]

Thanks for pointing this out. I'm unsure if the nvidia-open in kmod-nvidia-open-dkms-545.23.06-1.el7.x86_64.rpm is correct. I'll check with the maintainer of that package.

[cartermckinnon]

FWIW, It's convenient in my case to use nvidia-open, to distinguish it from the closed-source kmod in my DKMS tree.

[cartermckinnon]

@aritger do you have any update on this? I'd like to get rid of the sed I have to work around this 😄

[aritger]

Sorry, I didn't get much traction on this before. I've filed NVIDIA internal bug 4360392 for this, though.

[cartermckinnon]

Sounds good, thanks for looking into it!

[Issacwww]

Hey @aritger, is there any update for this?

[aritger]

Sorry, we haven't made any progress on this, yet.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}