Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address SAM issue 1184 #1055

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 26, 2023
Merged

Address SAM issue 1184 #1055

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 26, 2023

Conversation

sjanzou
Copy link
Collaborator

@sjanzou sjanzou commented Sep 22, 2023

No description provided.

@sjanzou sjanzou self-assigned this Sep 22, 2023
@sjanzou sjanzou requested a review from mjprilliman September 22, 2023 10:18
@sjanzou sjanzou linked an issue Sep 22, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@
"subarray1_nmody" : 2,
"subarray1_backtrack" : 0,
"subarray2_enable" : 0,
"subarray2_modules_per_string" : 0,
"subarray2_nstrings" : 0,
"subarray2_modules_per_string" : 1,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this going to effect default requirements as well? I.E. will subarray2_modules_per_string have to be set to 1 rather than 0 on case load even though subarray 2 is not enabled? Right now the default Detailed PV cases will fail with subarray 2-4 nstrings and modules_per_string set to 0. Guess it's a logical next step to update those defaults to allow SAM to still run when another subarray is added without extra steps.

@sjanzou sjanzou merged commit 7a59be1 into develop Sep 26, 2023
4 checks passed
@sjanzou sjanzou deleted the SAM_1184 branch September 26, 2023 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Var table prechecks
2 participants