Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add function to do forecast from mpasout file and refactor the umbrella directory #589

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: rrfs-mpas-jedi
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hu5970
Copy link
Contributor

@hu5970 hu5970 commented Jan 1, 2025

  1. Cycle forecast from previous cycle forecast mpasout file.
    The model need to write out right mpasout file.
  2. Refactor the log and umbrella directory and file name.

Tested on Jet with CONUS12km real-time runs.

The model need to write out right mpassout file.
2) Refactor the log and umbrella directory and file name.
@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@
config_block_decomp_file_prefix = 'graphinfo/${MESH_NAME}.graph.info.part.'
/
&restart
config_do_restart = ${do_restart}
config_do_restart = false
config_do_DAcycling = ${do_DAcycling}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can config_do_DAcycling handle init.nc and mpasout.nc files automatically?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, after adding a set of surface fields into mpasout.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @hu5970
At which step do we add those surface fields into mpasout?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@hu5970 hu5970 Jan 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is in model register. Not in the workflow. The mpasout needs to have full set of fields to be able to warm start the model forecast, including surface/hydrometeors and much more. Right now, we can cycling the model forecast but need to check all fields in the future.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for more information. Since we use GSL physics, has GSL's version of MPAS added those surface fields into the mpasout files?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants