-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bridge] Retry on finalized transaction not observed #19882
Merged
williampsmith
merged 4 commits into
main
from
william/handle-bridgenode-retryable-error
Oct 18, 2024
Merged
[Bridge] Retry on finalized transaction not observed #19882
williampsmith
merged 4 commits into
main
from
william/handle-bridgenode-retryable-error
Oct 18, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
williampsmith
force-pushed
the
william/handle-bridgenode-retryable-error
branch
from
October 16, 2024 19:05
c92e7e5
to
7153e8a
Compare
williampsmith
force-pushed
the
william/handle-bridgenode-retryable-error
branch
from
October 16, 2024 19:08
7153e8a
to
160938c
Compare
williampsmith
force-pushed
the
william/handle-bridgenode-retryable-error
branch
from
October 16, 2024 19:12
36e638a
to
93ed213
Compare
williampsmith
force-pushed
the
william/handle-bridgenode-retryable-error
branch
from
October 16, 2024 19:51
93ed213
to
74cccbf
Compare
longbowlu
reviewed
Oct 16, 2024
williampsmith
force-pushed
the
william/handle-bridgenode-retryable-error
branch
from
October 18, 2024 21:09
f58ddb8
to
9b81c16
Compare
longbowlu
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2024
williampsmith
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2024
## Description In some cases, the client observes a finalized transaction before most bridge authorities. In such cases, today the code will return an error without retries, causing this validator to be skipped in terms of signature aggregation. If bridge validators are using slow ethereum fullnode providers, for example, this can be a large amount of the committee, resulting in failed signature aggregation attempts in some cases (due to not achieving quorum), or high gas costs in others (due to not getting fewer higher staked validator signatures). The solution here is to add retry logic in the map function. ## Test plan Will run on a testnet node and see what happens. --- ## Release notes Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required. For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates. - [ ] Protocol: - [ ] Nodes (Validators and Full nodes): - [ ] Indexer: - [ ] JSON-RPC: - [ ] GraphQL: - [ ] CLI: - [ ] Rust SDK: - [ ] REST API:
longbowlu
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2024
## Description In some cases, the client observes a finalized transaction before most bridge authorities. In such cases, today the code will return an error without retries, causing this validator to be skipped in terms of signature aggregation. If bridge validators are using slow ethereum fullnode providers, for example, this can be a large amount of the committee, resulting in failed signature aggregation attempts in some cases (due to not achieving quorum), or high gas costs in others (due to not getting fewer higher staked validator signatures). The solution here is to add retry logic in the map function. ## Test plan Will run on a testnet node and see what happens. --- ## Release notes Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required. For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates. - [ ] Protocol: - [ ] Nodes (Validators and Full nodes): - [ ] Indexer: - [ ] JSON-RPC: - [ ] GraphQL: - [ ] CLI: - [ ] Rust SDK: - [ ] REST API:
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
In some cases, the client observes a finalized transaction before most bridge authorities. In such cases, today the code will return an error without retries, causing this validator to be skipped in terms of signature aggregation. If bridge validators are using slow ethereum fullnode providers, for example, this can be a large amount of the committee, resulting in failed signature aggregation attempts in some cases (due to not achieving quorum), or high gas costs in others (due to not getting fewer higher staked validator signatures).
The solution here is to add retry logic in the map function.
Test plan
Will run on a testnet node and see what happens.
Release notes
Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.
For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.