Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add make-agent flow to dev #8

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add make-agent flow to dev #8

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

microchipgnu
Copy link
Member

@microchipgnu microchipgnu commented Sep 10, 2024

PR Type

enhancement, dependencies


Description

  • Added make-agent as a new dependency in package.json.
  • Updated the dev script in package.json to include make-agent running on port 3000.
  • Updated pnpm-lock.yaml to include make-agent and its related dependencies.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
package.json
Add `make-agent` dependency and update `dev` script           

package.json

  • Added make-agent to dependencies.
  • Updated dev script to include make-agent with port 3000.
  • +2/-1     
    Dependencies
    pnpm-lock.yaml
    Update `pnpm-lock.yaml` with `make-agent` dependencies     

    pnpm-lock.yaml

  • Added make-agent and its dependencies.
  • Included various new dependencies related to make-agent.
  • +290/-16

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link

    vercel bot commented Sep 10, 2024

    The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

    Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
    ref-finance-agent-next ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 10, 2024 11:59am

    @mintbase-codium-pr-agent
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Dependency Management
    The addition of make-agent as a dependency and its integration into the dev script should be carefully reviewed to ensure compatibility and no conflicts with existing packages. It's important to verify that the specific version "^0.0.6" of make-agent works seamlessly with the current project setup.

    Dependency Locking
    The updates in pnpm-lock.yaml introduce multiple new packages and update existing ones. Each addition and update should be verified for compatibility issues, especially those involving major version changes or significant updates like [email protected] and [email protected].

    @mintbase-codium-pr-agent
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Align the version specifications of ajv in ajv-draft-04 to prevent conflicts

    The ajv-draft-04 package is marked as having an optional peer dependency on ajv
    version ^8.5.0, but it directly depends on [email protected]. This could lead to version
    conflicts or unnecessary duplication. Consider aligning the version specifications
    to avoid potential issues.

    pnpm-lock.yaml [516-524]

     [email protected]([email protected]):
       peerDependencies:
    -    ajv: ^8.5.0
    +    ajv: ^8.17.1
       peerDependenciesMeta:
         ajv:
           optional: true
       dependencies:
         ajv: 8.17.1
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: Aligning the version specifications of ajv in ajv-draft-04 prevents potential version conflicts and unnecessary duplication, which is crucial for maintaining a stable dependency tree. This suggestion addresses a possible issue effectively.

    10
    Best practice
    Improve the reliability of the dev script by using concurrently

    The dev script in package.json combines two commands using & which might lead to
    unexpected behavior if one command fails silently. It's recommended to use a more
    robust approach like concurrently or similar tools to handle parallel tasks.

    package.json [6]

    -"dev": "next dev & pnpx make-agent dev --port 3000",
    +"dev": "concurrently \"next dev\" \"pnpx make-agent dev --port 3000\"",
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Using concurrently to handle parallel tasks in the dev script is a best practice that improves reliability and handles potential failures more gracefully. This suggestion significantly enhances the robustness of the development workflow.

    9
    Maintainability
    Use a version range for elysia to allow more flexibility in updates

    The dependency elysia version is explicitly set to 1.0.16 which tightly couples your
    project to this specific version. It's recommended to use a version range to improve
    flexibility and ensure compatibility with future minor updates.

    pnpm-lock.yaml [19]

     elysia:
    -  version: 1.0.16(@sinclair/[email protected])([email protected])([email protected])
    +  version: ^1.0.16(@sinclair/[email protected])([email protected])([email protected])
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Using a version range for elysia improves flexibility and ensures compatibility with future minor updates, which is a good practice for maintainability. This change is straightforward and beneficial.

    8
    Enhancement
    Adjust the version specifier for make-agent to be more flexible

    It appears that the version specifier for make-agent is set to ^0.0.6, which might
    be too restrictive given the early stage of the package versioning. Consider using a
    more flexible version range to accommodate future minor updates without requiring
    manual changes to the lock file.

    pnpm-lock.yaml [20-22]

     make-agent:
    -  specifier: ^0.0.6
    +  specifier: ^0.0.x
       version: 0.0.6([email protected])([email protected])
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion to use a more flexible version range for make-agent is valid and can help accommodate future minor updates without requiring manual changes. However, the change from ^0.0.6 to ^0.0.x might be too broad and could introduce unexpected issues if not carefully managed.

    7

    Copy link
    Contributor

    @Markeljan Markeljan left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    LGTM, however this means the serverUrl won't be populated for production deployments? Would be good to have a fallback either a dynamic deployment url or just the hardcoded url it was before

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants