Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(.github): runtime comment on build step in release #403

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

KeisukeYamashita
Copy link
Owner

@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita commented Dec 3, 2024

Why

Typo...

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated version number to 0.2.2, reflecting enhancements and improvements.
  • Chores

    • Improved clarity in the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for better readability and management of deployment tasks.

@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita merged commit 90565c1 into main Dec 3, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in the .github/workflows/release.yaml file and a version increment in the Cargo.toml file. The workflow now triggers on semantic versioning tag pushes, with clarified permissions and improved comments in the build job for better readability. The version of the workspace package has been updated from "0.2.1" to "0.2.2" without other modifications to the package metadata.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/release.yaml Updated trigger for semantic versioning tags, clarified permissions, improved comments in the build job.
Cargo.toml Updated workspace package version from "0.2.1" to "0.2.2".

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the land of code, we hop with glee,
A new version blooms, as bright as can be!
Workflows refined, with clarity in sight,
Tagging the changes, our future is bright!
With each little tweak, our project takes flight,
Hooray for the updates, let’s code through the night! 🌙✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14ed66b and ca18914.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/release.yaml (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita deleted the fix-macos-runtime-comment branch December 3, 2024 11:07
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[actionlint] reported by reviewdog 🐶
the runner of "actions-rs/toolchain@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue [action]

- uses: actions-rs/toolchain@v1

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[actionlint] reported by reviewdog 🐶
the runner of "actions-rs/toolchain@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue [action]

- uses: actions-rs/toolchain@v1

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[actionlint] reported by reviewdog 🐶
the runner of "actions-rs/toolchain@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue [action]

- uses: actions-rs/toolchain@v1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant