Introduce (Bi)functor interface #226
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you, that's a great addition! What do you think about renaming |
omelkonian
force-pushed
the
functor-class
branch
from
c10b80c to
a0b70dc
Compare
- The universe levels in `Axiom.Set` do not allow for a functor instance; renamed to mapˢ until we find a solution (if there's any).
omelkonian
force-pushed
the
functor-class
branch
from
a0b70dc to
cec8cf8
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Provides a uniform way (i.e. typeclass) to perform (bi)functorial actions, rather than having to remember the names of each instantiation/module.