Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Snyk] Fix for 16 vulnerabilities #25

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Snyk] Fix for 16 vulnerabilities #25

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

indico-devops-sa
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

✨ Snyk has automatically assigned this pull request, set who gets assigned.

As this is a private repository, Snyk-bot does not have access. Therefore, this PR has been created automatically, but appears to have been created by a real user.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • requirements.extra.txt
⚠️ Warning 
networkx 2.6 requires scipy, which is not installed.
datasets 1.15.1 requires pyarrow, which is not installed.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 663/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.4		 Improper Input Validation
SNYK-PYTHON-AIOHTTP-6091621		 aiohttp:
3.8.6 -> 3.9.0
No Proof of Concept
medium severity 663/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.4		 Improper Input Validation
SNYK-PYTHON-AIOHTTP-6091622		 aiohttp:
3.8.6 -> 3.9.0
No Proof of Concept
high severity 654/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 8.8		 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
SNYK-PYTHON-NETWORKX-1062709		 networkx:
2.4 -> 2.6
No No Known Exploit
low severity 506/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7		 NULL Pointer Dereference
SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321964		 numpy:
1.21.3 -> 1.22.2
No Proof of Concept
low severity 399/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7		 Buffer Overflow
SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321966		 numpy:
1.21.3 -> 1.22.2
No No Known Exploit
low severity 506/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7		 Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321970		 numpy:
1.21.3 -> 1.22.2
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 909/1000
Why? Mature exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.6		 Heap-based Buffer Overflow
SNYK-PYTHON-PILLOW-5918878		 pillow:
9.5.0 -> 10.0.1
No Mature
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5		 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption ('Resource Exhaustion')
SNYK-PYTHON-PILLOW-6043904		 pillow:
9.5.0 -> 10.0.1
No No Known Exploit
critical severity 704/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8		 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
SNYK-PYTHON-PYARROW-6052811		 pyarrow:
12.0.1 -> 14.0.1
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 539/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5		 Directory Traversal
SNYK-PYTHON-STREAMLIT-2964954		 streamlit:
0.75.0 -> 1.27.0
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 509/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.9		 Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-PYTHON-STREAMLIT-3362246		 streamlit:
0.75.0 -> 1.27.0
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 536/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 4.3		 Improper Output Neutralization for Logs
SNYK-PYTHON-STREAMLIT-5880413		 streamlit:
0.75.0 -> 1.27.0
No Proof of Concept
low severity 384/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.4		 Open Redirect
SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-5537286		 tornado:
6.2 -> 6.3.3
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 494/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.6		 HTTP Request Smuggling
SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-5840803		 tornado:
6.2 -> 6.3.3
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 539/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5		 HTTP Request Smuggling
SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-6041512		 tornado:
6.2 -> 6.3.3
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 551/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 4.6		 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-VALIDATORS-6008990		 validators:
0.20.0 -> 0.21.0
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

👩‍💻 Set who automatically gets assigned

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Improper Input Validation
🦉 Deserialization of Untrusted Data
🦉 NULL Pointer Dereference
🦉 More lessons are available in Snyk Learn

@snyk-bot
fix: requirements.extra.txt to reduce vulnerabilities
077db0a 
The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-AIOHTTP-6091621
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-AIOHTTP-6091622
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-NETWORKX-1062709
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321964
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321966
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321970
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-PILLOW-5918878
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-PILLOW-6043904
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-PYARROW-6052811
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-STREAMLIT-2964954
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-STREAMLIT-3362246
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-STREAMLIT-5880413
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-5537286
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-5840803
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-6041512
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-VALIDATORS-6008990
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@benleetownsend benleetownsend

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@indico-devops-sa @benleetownsend @snyk-bot