Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Clearinghouse]: Bump io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api from 0.12.3 to 0.12.5 in /lib/clearinghouse #62

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 2, 2024

Bumps io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api from 0.12.3 to 0.12.5.

Release notes

Sourced from io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api's releases.

0.12.5

This release fixes issue #916 and ensures that builders' NestedCollection changes are applied to the collection immediately as mutation methods are called, no longer requiring application developers to call .and() to 'commit' or apply a change. For example, prior to this release, the following code did not apply changes:

JwtBuilder builder = Jwts.builder();
builder.audience().add("an-audience"); // no .and() call
builder.compact(); // would not keep 'an-audience'

Now this code works as expected and all other NestedCollection instances like it apply changes immediately (e.g. when calling .add(value)).

However, standard fluent builder chains are still recommended for readability when feasible, e.g.

Jwts.builder()
    .audience().add("an-audience").and() // allows fluent chaining
    .subject("Joe")
    // etc...
    .compact()

These same notes are repeated in the CHANGELOG, and as always, project documentation is in the README.

Please allow 30 minutes from the time this announcement is published for the release to be available in Maven Central.

0.12.4

This is patch release completes 10 issues, with two especially noteworthy changes, and a number of other smaller bug fixes and enhancements.

  1. The default Jackson deserializer will now reject duplicate JSON members by default in an attempt to be a little more strict at rejecting potentially malicious or malformed JSON. This is a default and can be overridden with a custom ObjectMapper if desired.
  2. Password-based JWE encryption key algorithms (PBES2_HS256_A128KW, PBES2_HS384_A192KW and PBES2_HS512_A256KW) now enforce an upper bound (maximum) number of iterations allowed during decryption to mitigate against potential DoS attacks. Many thanks to Jingcheng Yang and Jianjun Chen from Sichuan University and Zhongguancun Lab for their work on this!

A number of other issues fixed: thread-safe ServiceLoader usage for dynamic JSON processor lookup, Android enhancements for JSON Reader APIs, fixed Elliptic Curve field element padding, and more. Please read the 0.12.4 CHANGELOG for full details of all of these changes, and as always, project documentation is in the 0.12.4 README.

Please allow 30 minutes from the time this announcement is published for the release to be available in Maven Central.

Changelog

Sourced from io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api's changelog.

0.12.5

This patch release:

  • Ensures that builders' NestedCollection changes are applied to the collection immediately as mutation methods are called, no longer requiring application developers to call .and() to 'commit' or apply a change. For example, prior to this release, the following code did not apply changes:

    JwtBuilder builder = Jwts.builder();
    builder.audience().add("an-audience"); // no .and() call
    builder.compact(); // would not keep 'an-audience'

    Now this code works as expected and all other NestedCollection instances like it apply changes immediately (e.g. when calling .add(value)).

    However, standard fluent builder chains are still recommended for readability when feasible, e.g.

    Jwts.builder()
        .audience().add("an-audience").and() // allows fluent chaining
        .subject("Joe")
        // etc...
        .compact()

    See Issue 916.

0.12.4

This patch release includes various changes listed below.

Jackson Default Parsing Behavior

This release makes two behavioral changes to JJWT's default Jackson ObjectMapper parsing settings:

  1. In the interest of having stronger standards to reject potentially malformed/malicious/accidental JSON that could have undesirable effects on an application, JJWT's default ObjectMapper is now configured to explicitly reject/fail parsing JSON (JWT headers and/or Claims) if/when that JSON contains duplicate JSON member names.

    For example, now the following JSON, if parsed, would fail (be rejected) by default:

    {
      "hello": "world",
      "thisWillFail": 42,
      "thisWillFail": "test"
    }

    Technically, the JWT RFCs do allow duplicate named fields as long as the last parsed member is the one used (see JWS RFC 7515, Section 4), so this is allowed. However, because JWTs often reflect security concepts, it's usually better to be defensive and reject these

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 2399e2f [maven-release-plugin] prepare release 0.12.5
  • 8d3de65 Preparing for 0.12.5 release
  • a0a123e PR #917
  • afcd889 0.12.4 staging (#913)
  • dd10b12 Added JWK Set documentation to README.mdJwkset doc (#912)
  • 6335381 PBES2 decryption maximum iterations (#911)
  • 2884eb7 - Updating to GitHub latest actions/checkout and actions/setup-java script ve...
  • 628bd6f Secret JWK k values larger than HMAC-SHA minimums (#909)
  • b12dabf Fix small typos (#908)
  • 26f5dc3 Updating changelog with more information/clarity for the 0.12.4 release (#907)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api](https://github.com/jwtk/jjwt) from 0.12.3 to 0.12.5.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/jwtk/jjwt/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/jwtk/jjwt/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](jwtk/jjwt@0.12.3...0.12.5)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file java Pull requests that update Java code labels Feb 2, 2024
@joshbaskaran
Copy link
Contributor

Should now be picked up by the the conventions plugin.

Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 9, 2024

Looks like io.jsonwebtoken:jjwt-api is no longer a dependency, so this is no longer needed.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Feb 9, 2024
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/gradle/lib/clearinghouse/io.jsonwebtoken-jjwt-api-0.12.5 branch February 9, 2024 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file java Pull requests that update Java code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant