-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "fix(notify): Handle case with undefined variable (#32165)" #32494
Conversation
This reverts commit e999173.
Gitlab CI Configuration ChangesModified Jobsnotify notify:
dependencies: []
image: registry.ddbuild.io/slack-notifier:v27936653-9a2a7db-sdm-gbi-jammy@sha256:c9d1145319d1904fa72ea97904a15200d3cb684324723f9e1700bc02cc85065c
resource_group: notification
rules:
- if: $DEPLOY_AGENT == "true" || $DDR_WORKFLOW_ID != null
when: always
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
when: always
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
when: always
script:
- GITLAB_TOKEN=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $GITLAB_TOKEN read_api)
|| exit $?; export GITLAB_TOKEN
- DD_API_KEY=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_API_KEY_ORG2 token)
|| exit $?; export DD_API_KEY
- python3 -m pip install -r requirements.txt -r tasks/libs/requirements-notifications.txt
- - invoke -e notify.send-message -p $CI_PIPELINE_ID
- - invoke -e notify.check-consistent-failures -p $CI_PIPELINE_ID
+ - "# Do not send notifications if this is a child pipeline of another repo\n# The\
+ \ triggering repo should already have its own notification system\nif [ \"$CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE\"\
+ \ != \"pipeline\" ]; then\n if [ \"$DEPLOY_AGENT\" = \"true\" ]; then\n invoke\
+ \ -e notify.send-message --notification-type \"deploy\"\n elif [ \"$CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE\"\
+ \ != \"push\" ]; then\n invoke -e notify.send-message --notification-type \"\
+ trigger\"\n else\n invoke -e notify.send-message --notification-type \"merge\"\
+ \n fi\n if [ \"$CI_COMMIT_BRANCH\" = \"$CI_DEFAULT_BRANCH\" ]; then\n invoke\
+ \ notify.check-consistent-failures\n fi\nelse\n echo \"This pipeline was triggered\
+ \ by another repository, skipping notification.\"\nfi\n"
stage: notify
tags:
- arch:amd64
timeout: 15 minutes Changes Summary
ℹ️ Diff available in the job log. |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: a6860d5 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.18 | [-0.46, +0.83] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.18 | [-0.61, +0.97] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.12 | [-0.63, +0.86] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.11 | [-0.36, +0.58] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.10 | [+0.05, +0.14] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.08 | [-0.05, +0.20] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.07 | [-0.01, +0.16] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.85, +0.97] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.11, +0.12] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.96, +0.90] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.12 | [-0.96, +0.72] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.50 | [-1.29, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.59 | [-0.66, -0.53] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.26 | [-1.94, -0.59] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -1.91 | [-5.10, +1.28] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 9/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
This reverts commit e999173.
What does this PR do?
Reverts #32165 because it made the unit tests flakey (example, example)
Motivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes