-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use HTTP zstd compression for the Agent telemetry payloads #32440
Conversation
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51796455 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 2a1fca2 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 8f37b9b Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.14 | [+1.06, +1.21] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.21 | [-0.57, +0.98] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.17 | [-0.30, +0.63] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.15 | [+0.07, +0.24] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.04 | [+0.01, +0.08] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.69, +0.77] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.63, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.11, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.79, +0.78] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.89, +0.87] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.83, +0.81] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.07 | [-0.90, +0.75] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.15 | [-0.28, -0.02] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.79 | [-1.47, -0.10] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -1.31 | [-4.55, +1.94] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
f141af8
to
8e3e26e
Compare
8e3e26e
to
e6aff9b
Compare
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
What does this PR do?
Adds compression to Agent telemetry payloads
Motivation
Decrease network utilization
Describe how you validated your changes
Add TestUsingGZipCompressionInAgentTelemetrySender unit test
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes
Small payloads ~600 bytes decreased by 2x+, medium payloads ~3k are decreased by ~6x