-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CONTP-545] quit leader election if context was cancelled #32331
[CONTP-545] quit leader election if context was cancelled #32331
Conversation
return | ||
default: | ||
log.Infof("Starting leader election process for %q...", le.HolderIdentity) | ||
le.leaderElector.Run(le.ctx) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Run
method of the leader elector is blocking, and will terminate if ctx
was cancelled OR if the current instance lost leadership.
In case we lost leadership, we should call Run
again to participate in the leader election process.
However, if the context was cancelled, we should just quit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From the documentation:
Run will not return before leader election loop is stopped by ctx or it has stopped holding the leader lease
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51428482 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 364ceb6 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 332025d Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.71 | [+0.64, +0.78] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.54 | [-0.18, +1.26] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.30 | [-0.36, +0.97] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.10 | [-0.68, +0.88] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.08 | [-0.55, +0.72] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.07 | [+0.04, +0.11] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.04 | [-0.09, +0.18] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.71, +0.78] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.44, +0.50] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.88, +0.93] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.95, +0.95] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.90, +0.90] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.10, +0.07] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.62 | [-0.74, -0.51] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -0.74 | [-3.67, +2.19] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.87 | [-1.64, -0.09] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
What does this PR do?
This PR ensures that the go routine running leader election is properly stopped when the main cluster agent context is cancelled.
Motivation
Avoid go routine leaks.
Describe how you validated your changes
Unit tests and E2E are sufficient.
But for extra validation, you can do the following QA:
Deploy the DCA with multiple replicas with leader election enabled.
Once a leader is elected, kill the leader, and ensure that a new leader is elected.
Example:
Wait for a leader to be elected:
From
agent status
on any dca instance:Kill the leader:
Ensure that a new leader is finally elected:
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
None
Additional Notes
None