Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CONTP-545] quit leader election if context was cancelled #32331

Merged

Conversation

adel121
Copy link
Contributor

@adel121 adel121 commented Dec 18, 2024

What does this PR do?

This PR ensures that the go routine running leader election is properly stopped when the main cluster agent context is cancelled.

Motivation

Avoid go routine leaks.

Describe how you validated your changes

Unit tests and E2E are sufficient.

But for extra validation, you can do the following QA:

Deploy the DCA with multiple replicas with leader election enabled.

Once a leader is elected, kill the leader, and ensure that a new leader is elected.

Example:

datadog:
  apiKeyExistingSecret: datadog-secret
  appKeyExistingSecret: datadog-secret
  logLevel: DEBUG
  kubelet:
    tlsVerify: false

clusterAgent:
  enabled: true
  replicas: 3

Wait for a leader to be elected:

From agent status on any dca instance:

===============
Leader Election
===============
  Leader Election Status:  Running
  Leader Name is: datadog-agent-cluster-agent-6f4947f5b5-n462j
  Last Acquisition of the lease: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:26:28 UTC
  Renewed leadership: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:26:58 UTC
  Number of leader transitions: 5 transitions

Kill the leader:

kubectl delete pod  datadog-agent-cluster-agent-6f4947f5b5-n462j

Ensure that a new leader is finally elected:

===============
Leader Election
===============
  Leader Election Status:  Running
  Leader Name is: datadog-agent-cluster-agent-6f4947f5b5-ngxtw
  Last Acquisition of the lease: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:29:06 UTC
  Renewed leadership: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:29:06 UTC
  Number of leader transitions: 6 transitions

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

None

Additional Notes

None

@adel121 adel121 added kind/enhancement changelog/no-changelog component/cluster-agent team/container-platform The Container Platform Team qa/rc-required Only for a PR that requires validation on the Release Candidate labels Dec 18, 2024
@adel121 adel121 added this to the 7.62.0 milestone Dec 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Dec 18, 2024
return
default:
log.Infof("Starting leader election process for %q...", le.HolderIdentity)
le.leaderElector.Run(le.ctx)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Run method of the leader elector is blocking, and will terminate if ctx was cancelled OR if the current instance lost leadership.

In case we lost leadership, we should call Run again to participate in the leader election process.

However, if the context was cancelled, we should just quit.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the documentation:

Run will not return before leader election loop is stopped by ctx or it has stopped holding the leader lease

@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Dec 18, 2024
@adel121 adel121 marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 11:29
@adel121 adel121 requested review from a team as code owners December 18, 2024 11:29
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 332025d2eca869ea264ad9abde503853757d5f70

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.58MB 78.58MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.65MB 78.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.65MB 78.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.78MB 55.78MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 505.04MB 505.04MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.30MB 113.30MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.37MB 113.37MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.37MB 113.37MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.77MB 108.77MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 108.84MB 108.84MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.01MB 1196.98MB 1196.99MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -0.01MB 1196.98MB 1196.99MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -0.01MB 1187.74MB 1187.76MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.02MB 942.97MB 942.99MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb -0.02MB 933.75MB 933.77MB 140.00MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51428482 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 364ceb6

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 69b5801c-4333-4204-bfca-46f58f298140

Baseline: 332025d
Comparison: 364ceb6
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.71 [+0.64, +0.78] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.54 [-0.18, +1.26] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.30 [-0.36, +0.97] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.10 [-0.68, +0.88] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.08 [-0.55, +0.72] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.07 [+0.04, +0.11] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization +0.04 [-0.09, +0.18] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.71, +0.78] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.03 [-0.44, +0.50] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.88, +0.93] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.00 [-0.95, +0.95] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.00 [-0.90, +0.90] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.02 [-0.10, +0.07] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.62 [-0.74, -0.51] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.74 [-3.67, +2.19] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.87 [-1.64, -0.09] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@adel121
Copy link
Contributor Author

adel121 commented Dec 18, 2024

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-12-18 13:16:10 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 29m.


2024-12-18 13:36:19 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit f5e9ae4 into main Dec 18, 2024
284 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the adelhajhassan/quit_leaderelection_if_context_was_cancelled branch December 18, 2024 13:36
@adel121 adel121 changed the title quit leader election if context was cancelled [CONTP-545] quit leader election if context was cancelled Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog component/cluster-agent kind/enhancement medium review PR review might take time qa/rc-required Only for a PR that requires validation on the Release Candidate team/container-platform The Container Platform Team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants