Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix pulumi.DependsOn in test-infra-definitions #31393

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

L3n41c
Copy link
Member

@L3n41c L3n41c commented Nov 22, 2024

What does this PR do?

Update test-infra-definitions to use a version that contains DataDog/test-infra-definitions#1261.
This new version of test-infra-definitions guarantees that pods that need to go through the admission controller are created only once the Datadog cluster agent is up and running.
As a consequence, we can remove the hacky pod deletion that was introduced to guarantee the pod went through the admission controller.

Motivation

Clean

Describe how to test/QA your changes

Validate that containers e2e tests are not flaky.

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@L3n41c L3n41c added team/containers dev/testing changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Nov 22, 2024
@L3n41c L3n41c added this to the 7.61.0 milestone Nov 22, 2024
@L3n41c L3n41c requested review from a team as code owners November 22, 2024 17:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the medium review PR review might take time label Nov 22, 2024
@L3n41c L3n41c force-pushed the lenaic/fix_depends_on_in_test-infra branch from 786119e to 14b8f05 Compare November 22, 2024 17:28
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Nov 22, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 51412609 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51412609 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 234fbf8

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 55b9f798-bd33-47ec-a06f-dd44519e236b

Baseline: 6fb76d5
Comparison: 234fbf8
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +1.62 [+1.52, +1.73] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.77 [+0.71, +0.83] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.08 [-0.38, +0.54] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.06 [-0.73, +0.84] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.03 [-0.02, +0.07] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.09, +0.13] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.62, +0.63] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.70, +0.71] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.00 [-0.88, +0.88] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.91, +0.88] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.79, +0.74] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput -0.07 [-0.88, +0.74] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.29 [-0.42, -0.16] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.37 [-1.03, +0.29] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -1.45 [-2.18, -0.72] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.80 [-4.71, +1.11] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@L3n41c L3n41c force-pushed the lenaic/fix_depends_on_in_test-infra branch from 0dece34 to 3821b3e Compare December 12, 2024 17:35
@L3n41c L3n41c force-pushed the lenaic/fix_depends_on_in_test-infra branch from 3821b3e to 5c2dbf1 Compare December 12, 2024 18:05
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 5b2054cb1da177beebdbbc4eacc59278c7eb92dd

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 1265.77MB 1265.77MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.25MB 113.25MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.42MB 78.42MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 526.60MB 526.60MB 70.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 1275.00MB 1275.00MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 1275.00MB 1275.00MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.32MB 113.32MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.32MB 113.32MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.50MB 78.50MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.50MB 78.50MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 1000.86MB 1000.86MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.73MB 108.73MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.65MB 55.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 1010.08MB 1010.08MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 108.80MB 108.80MB 10.00MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 6fb76d59dcac4a66e7ed9bb68845dfe1ed653a7d

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.02MB ⚠️ 933.78MB 933.76MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.02MB ⚠️ 943.00MB 942.98MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.58MB 78.58MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.65MB 78.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.65MB 78.65MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.78MB 55.78MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 505.05MB 505.05MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.31MB 113.31MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.38MB 113.38MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.38MB 113.38MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.78MB 108.78MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 108.84MB 108.84MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm -0.01MB 1197.00MB 1197.01MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse -0.01MB 1197.00MB 1197.01MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb -0.01MB 1187.77MB 1187.77MB 140.00MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@L3n41c
Copy link
Member Author

L3n41c commented Dec 18, 2024

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-12-18 10:44:43 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 27m.


2024-12-18 11:09:51 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit d598917 into main Dec 18, 2024
393 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the lenaic/fix_depends_on_in_test-infra branch December 18, 2024 11:09
@github-actions github-actions bot modified the milestones: 7.61.0, 7.62.0 Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog dev/testing medium review PR review might take time qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation team/containers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants