-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clear facade recipes #1445
Clear facade recipes #1445
Conversation
Fixes: * Fix inputs of JEI recipes not being recognized Closes CyclopsMC#1312
Fixes: * Fix Jade integration not working, Closes CyclopsMC#1438
Co-authored-by: Crowdin Bot <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand the need for a custom recipe serializer, but I'm pretty sure the custom recipe type is not necessary. Could you try using the existing recipe type? I think this will simplify this code by a lot.
I could modify the 2 existing recipe types to directly call the calculator method, but the reason I did it with an additional recipe type is to make it clear in the JSON recipe files that it's a special type. If you think that just putting it in the special folder twice won't cause too much confusion, I'll go ahead and modify the 2 existing classes to directly call the calculator method. |
Sure, modifying the existing recipe type is fine. It would become a bit similar to the crafting recipe type, so we can probably even use the same method name as there. |
e5cfb01
to
1344049
Compare
I'm closing this PR to open a new one on a new branch to both keep the commit history cleaner and help me make sure I don't forget to delete any unrequired code. |
Closes #1424 by adding a normal crafting recipe for lossy clearing and a recipe in both squeezers for non-lossy clearing