Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #61, #51 #62

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Fix #61, #51 #62

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

somebody1234
Copy link
Contributor

@somebody1234 somebody1234 commented Mar 1, 2019

Might fix issues #61 and #51.

@somebody1234 somebody1234 changed the title Fix #61 Fix #61, #51 Mar 2, 2019
@ConorOBrien-Foxx
Copy link
Owner

So you've found that the bottleneck was the lexer? (In 99320fa) I assume that's why \Gs were added to the RegExs.

@ConorOBrien-Foxx
Copy link
Owner

Also, is there a reason you chose a different color scheme for the output in the REPL than the scheme which colors the input?

image

@somebody1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ConorOBrien-Foxx Well, the output currently displays as Ruby objects, making things consistent would be a very good idea but I'm not sure what would be the best way to do that

@somebody1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ConorOBrien-Foxx Yeah, the bottleneck is still the lexer, looks like one way would be to combine the regexes (doable, but might be a bit messy)

@somebody1234 somebody1234 closed this by deleting the head repository Jan 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants