Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature](mlu-ops): upgrade toolkit and cnnl. #1062

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

PetrelYy
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. 🚀🚀

1. Motivation

Please describe your motivation and the goal you want to achieve through this pull request.

2. Modification

Please briefly describe what modification is made in this pull request, and indicate where to make the modification.

Are new test cases added? If so, please post the corresponding generator-PR link here.

3. Test Report

If you want to know how to do operator testing, you can see GTest-User-Guide-zh.

3.1 Modification Details

3.1.1 Accuracy Acceptance Standard

For static threshold standard details, see: MLU-OPS™ Accuracy Acceptance Standard.

  • static threshold
    • diff1
      • float32 mlu diff1 <= 1e-5
      • float32 mlu diff1 <= 3e-3
      • float16 mlu diff1 <= 3e-3
    • diff2
      • float32 mlu diff2 <= 1e-5
      • float32 mlu diff2 <= 3e-3
      • float16 mlu diff2 <= 3e-3
    • diff3
      • mlu diff3 == 0
      • mlu diff3_1 == 0
      • mlu diff3_2 == 0
  • dynamic threshold
    • diff1: mlu diff1 <= max(baseline diff1 * 10, static threshold)
    • diff2: mlu diff2 <= max(baseline diff2 * 10, static threshold)
    • diff3: mlu diff3 <= max(baseline diff3 * 10, static threshold)
      • float32, threshold = 1e-5
      • float16, threshold = 1e-3

3.1.2 Operator Scheme checklist

  • Supported hardware
    • MLU370
    • MLU590
  • Job types
    • BLOCK
    • UNION1
    • UNION2
    • UNION4
    • The operator will dynamically select the most suitable task type, for example, UNION8

3.2 Accuracy Test

3.2.1 Accuracy Test

If you have checked the following items, please tick the relevant box.

  • Data type test (e.g. float32/int8)
  • Multi-dimensional tensor test
  • Layout test
  • Different size/integer remainder end segment/alignment misalignment test
  • Zero dimensional tensor test/zero element test
  • stability test
  • Multiple platform test
  • Gen_case module test, see: Gencase-User-Guide-zh
  • Nan/INF tests
  • Bug fix tests
  • For memory leak check details, see: GTest-User-Guide-zh
  • For code coverage check details, see: GTest-User-Guide-zh
  • For I/O calculation efficiency check details, see: MLU-OPS™-Performance-Acceptance-Standard

3.2.2 Parameter Check

Test Point-1: When a new operator is submitted, the test points are given and the test results are stated. Acceptance Standard: Normal error.

Please fill your test results(Error Message) in here, ...

Test Point-2: Whether illegal parameters are passed. Acceptance Standard: Normal error.

Test results...

3.3 Performance Test

See MLU-OPS™ Performance Acceptance Standard for details.

Platform:MLU370

# The test results should contain Op name, Shape, Data type,  
#   MLU Hardware Time(us), MLU Interface Time(us), MLU IO Efficiency, 
#   MLU Compute Efficiency, and Mlu Workspace Size(Bytes)
# 
# for example:
#
# ----------- case0 -----------
# case0
# [Op name                ]: abs
# [Shape                  ]: input.shape=[1024,1024,3,4], output.shape=[1024,1024,3,4]
# [Data type]             ]: float32
# [MLU Hardware Time      ]: 15728 (us)
# [MLU Interface Time     ]: 369.008 (us)
# [MLU IO Efficiency      ]: 0.23275
# [MLU Compute Efficiency ]: 0.5
# [Mlu Workspace Size     ]: -1 (Bytes)
# 
# ----------- case1 -----------
# ...

Platform:MLU590

# ----------- case0 -----------
# ----------- case1 -----------
# ...

3.4 Summary Analysis

Please give a brief overview here, if you want to note and summarize the content.

@PetrelYy PetrelYy added the Feature Contribute a new feature label Jul 24, 2024
@PetrelYy PetrelYy force-pushed the upgrade_toolkit_nl_version branch from 309e3b7 to c760956 Compare July 24, 2024 10:00
@PetrelYy PetrelYy force-pushed the upgrade_toolkit_nl_version branch 3 times, most recently from c9cf8c3 to 74c3995 Compare July 24, 2024 10:30
@PetrelYy PetrelYy force-pushed the upgrade_toolkit_nl_version branch from 74c3995 to c1272f9 Compare July 24, 2024 10:32
@PetrelYy PetrelYy merged commit 599cebb into Cambricon:master Jul 25, 2024
1 of 5 checks passed
@PetrelYy PetrelYy deleted the upgrade_toolkit_nl_version branch July 25, 2024 02:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Contribute a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants