refactor(all): Refactored the formatting of files #18
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications across several files, primarily enhancing middleware functionality and refining code organization. Key updates include the addition of CORS middleware in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
router/router.go (1)
86-98: Consider adding documentation for new HTTP method handlers.
The newly added HTTP method handlers (Options, Head, Connect, Trace) would benefit from documentation comments explaining their intended use cases and any specific considerations.
Example documentation:
// Options handles HTTP OPTIONS requests for the given path
// Typically used for CORS preflight requests
func (a *App) Options(path string, handler func(req *req.Request, res *req.Response))
// Head handles HTTP HEAD requests for the given path
// Similar to GET but returns only headers without body
func (a *App) Head(path string, handler func(req *req.Request, res *req.Response))📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- examples/cors/main.go (0 hunks)
- examples/crud/main.go (1 hunks)
- middleware/cors_test.go (0 hunks)
- middleware/csrf_test.go (0 hunks)
- plugins/plugin_test.go (2 hunks)
- router/router.go (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- examples/cors/main.go
- middleware/cors_test.go
- middleware/csrf_test.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- examples/crud/main.go
🔇 Additional comments (3)
plugins/plugin_test.go (2)
21-21: LGTM! Improved parameter declaration style
The change follows Go's idiomatic style of combining parameters of the same type in method signatures.
30-30: LGTM! Consistent parameter declaration style
The change maintains consistency with the Route method signature and follows Go's idiomatic style.
router/router.go (1)
47-47: LGTM! Clean parameter declaration.
The simplified parameter declaration follows Go's idiomatic style for declaring multiple parameters of the same type.
|
|
||
| func (a *App) Trace(path string, handler func(req *req.Request, res *req.Response)) { | ||
| a.Route(http.MethodTrace, path, handler) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
TRACE method requires additional security controls
The codebase currently:
- Has no specific security controls for the TRACE method
- CORS middleware by default doesn't include TRACE in allowed methods
- Lacks method-specific security middleware
To secure the TRACE endpoint:
- Add TRACE method to your security policy documentation
- Implement a security middleware specifically for TRACE requests
- Consider disabling TRACE method in production by default
- If needed, explicitly enable it through CORS middleware's AllowMethods
🔗 Analysis chain
Security consideration for TRACE method.
The TRACE method can potentially expose sensitive information in HTTP headers. Consider if this method is necessary for your use case, as it's commonly disabled in production environments for security reasons.
Let's verify if there are any security measures in place:
Let's examine the content of these files to understand if there are any security measures specifically related to the TRACE method.
Let's check the middleware implementations for any security-related configurations or method restrictions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for security middleware or configurations
rg -l "security|middleware.*trace|disable.*trace"
Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of relevant files for TRACE-related security measures
echo "=== docs/middleware.md ==="
rg -i "trace" docs/middleware.md -C 2
echo -e "\n=== CHANGELOG.md ==="
rg -i "trace" CHANGELOG.md -C 2
# Look for any security middleware implementations
echo -e "\n=== Security Middleware Implementations ==="
rg -l "middleware" --type go
# Check for any TRACE-related code in middleware
echo -e "\n=== TRACE in Middleware ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_) {
$$$
MethodTrace
$$$
}'
Length of output: 745
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check middleware implementations for method restrictions or security configurations
echo "=== Checking CORS middleware for method restrictions ==="
rg -A 5 "AllowMethods|Methods" middleware/cors.go
echo -e "\n=== Checking security-related middleware for method handling ==="
rg -A 5 "Method|HandleFunc" middleware/auth.go middleware/csrf.go
# Check if there's any method filtering in the router
echo -e "\n=== Checking router for method handling ==="
rg "Method|HandleFunc" router/router.go -A 3
Length of output: 3470
Description
Related Issues (if any)
Type of Changes
Please mark the options that best describe your PR:
Checklist
go test ./...).README.md, code comments).Additional Notes
I used
gofumpt --extra -w .which applied extra formatting. You may or may not know about this cmd.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests