-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more logic for POINT_PROCESS registration function #1106
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1106 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.16% 88.18% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 176 176
Lines 12684 12791 +107
==========================================
+ Hits 11183 11280 +97
- Misses 1501 1511 +10 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This contains a lot of unrelated changes. Could we please split it:
I'd think reviewing 4. first would be best, with 1. in parallel. |
Right, I thought it would be better to get all the related parts of the code I touched together so I don't miss anything from |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good to me, had just one minor question
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks Ok. I have few comments+questions to clarify.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I am going to attempt |
073ebbd
to
2cf0c02
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #192525 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here! Status and direct links: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I skimmed through the changes one more time and looked on NEURON's nocmodl side. Changes look reasonable.
As all tests passes, including existing ones, I am going to merge this.
* Added hoc_register_prop_size and hoc_register_dparam_semantics * Implemented big part of the nrn_alloc to make POINT_PROCESS work * Added test for POINT_PROCESS location * Added test for parameters
point_register_mech()
needed forPOINT_PROCESS
es and related function definitionsnrn_alloc
needed to create reasonablePOINT_PROCESS
testsPOINT_PROCESS
PARAMETER
ION
s as well in_<mech>_reg()
diam
as well in_<mech>_reg()