Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Switch to Zammad 6.3. #402

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024
Merged

Switch to Zammad 6.3. #402

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

mgruner
Copy link
Collaborator

@mgruner mgruner commented Mar 25, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This MR prepares the changes required for Zammad 6.3.

  • The var folder will be gone.
  • Backup script should instead back up storage/
  • POSTGRESQL_OPTIONS should get a new default value that specifies the default connection pool size of Zammad (50).

mgruner
mgruner commented Mar 25, 2024
View reviewed changes
.env Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mgruner mgruner requested review from monotek and t-shehab March 25, 2024 11:32
monotek
monotek requested changes Mar 25, 2024
View reviewed changes
.env Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mgruner mgruner requested a review from monotek March 26, 2024 06:22
@mgruner mgruner mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2024
Closed
@mgruner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mgruner commented Apr 17, 2024

@monotek could you please have a look again? Zammad 6.3 was released today, and I changed the version to the final one for 6.3.0 now.

@mgruner mgruner merged commit 93ba19c into master Apr 17, 2024
9 checks passed
@mgruner mgruner deleted the zammad-63 branch April 17, 2024 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@monotek monotek monotek approved these changes

@t-shehab t-shehab Awaiting requested review from t-shehab

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mgruner @monotek