-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IDEA: V1 FINAL PATCH #198
Comments
ghost
mentioned this issue
Apr 8, 2018
I have been thinking about this a lot more lately and have dived into the raw core 1 source. I have went the route of providing a _prevent parameter for the register method.
The |
I call this |
To Do:
|
Thinking about:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
0 participants
A thought for backwards compatibility to think about....
This is the thought I was having while I was setting up branches for the v2s docs.
I was having thoughts of putting in one final change branch to the v1 repo so that it would scrub xtag and it's dependent methods and present them differently to the window's object so that v2 could read the prior version and inherit it's features.
For instance, when you load xtag into the global scope you could search the
header dom
for a meta tag with the appropriatename/content
information. Like:I am not sure if this is a direction you ever thought of going, but an advantage to using a method that utilizes meta content is that it would be more flexible to other developers wanting to mix-in their own code or dependencies that require features on versions of other libraries by making that info readily available.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: