You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This might be considered a issue or simply a design choice, but the fact raft_recv_appendentries_response does not invoke raft_apply_all after updating the commit index and rather relies on the next call of raft_periodic to do that, means that a client call to raft_msg_entry_response_committed might return 1 even if the FSM hasn't yet applied the log entry.
It feels this might cause confusion to users or timing-related issues, see for example the scenario I described in issue #12 of ticketd.
Please let me know if my reading is correct. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This might be considered a issue or simply a design choice, but the fact
raft_recv_appendentries_response
does not invokeraft_apply_all
after updating the commit index and rather relies on the next call ofraft_periodic
to do that, means that a client call toraft_msg_entry_response_committed
might return 1 even if the FSM hasn't yet applied the log entry.It feels this might cause confusion to users or timing-related issues, see for example the scenario I described in issue #12 of ticketd.
Please let me know if my reading is correct. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: