You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using SvABA for structural variant calling on a bacterial genome with gene edits. I have noticed that all edited regions are being discarded in the variant calling, even though the edits appear successful based on mapping depth.
Specifically, I deleted gene A at positions pos1-pos2. In the bam file, I see mapping depth of 0 across this region, indicating a successful edit. I can also see the deleted region assembled as a contig in the alignments.txt.gz file, named "Global BP: chr:pos1(+) to chr:pos2(-) c_1_343001_368001". This contig has ~60X depth.
However, I cannot find this deletion in the final bps.txt.gz and unfiltered sv.vcf files. The log file also does not mention why this contig was discarded:
...assembled 1 contigs for c_1_343001_368001
...assembled 8 contigs for c_other
Do you have any suggestions on why this candidate variant was filtered out? And which SvABA parameters I could adjust to retain it in the final callset? I want to ensure I am capturing all real edits.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am using SvABA for structural variant calling on a bacterial genome with gene edits. I have noticed that all edited regions are being discarded in the variant calling, even though the edits appear successful based on mapping depth.
Specifically, I deleted gene A at positions pos1-pos2. In the bam file, I see mapping depth of 0 across this region, indicating a successful edit. I can also see the deleted region assembled as a contig in the alignments.txt.gz file, named "Global BP: chr:pos1(+) to chr:pos2(-) c_1_343001_368001". This contig has ~60X depth.
However, I cannot find this deletion in the final bps.txt.gz and unfiltered sv.vcf files. The log file also does not mention why this contig was discarded:
Do you have any suggestions on why this candidate variant was filtered out? And which SvABA parameters I could adjust to retain it in the final callset? I want to ensure I am capturing all real edits.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: