Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Concept]: InformationAudit #202

Open
Paul-Ryan76 opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[Concept]: InformationAudit #202

Paul-Ryan76 opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Paul-Ryan76
Copy link
Contributor

Specs

DPV

New Concept(s)

Term: e.g., Information Audit
Label: e.g., Information Audit
Definition: Examine data
Parent term: e.g., Parent Concept
Source: e.g., Based on Data Map requirements from ICO https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/accountability-and-governance/documentation/how-do-we-document-our-processing-activities/
Usage note: may require discussion , as has multiple uses

Changed Concept(s)

Existing Term: e.g., dpv:NewConcept or risk:NewConcept
Change: e.g., change label from X to Y, or add usage note stating "xyz"
Justification: optional comment giving reasons why the change should be made

@coolharsh55
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @Paul-Ryan76 - since its from ICO I think its clear that this is a useful term. A definition we can use is "a systematic review of information to identify what information exists or is available, how it is being collected, generated, stored, used, and what information flows are associted with it". I'll add it under Audit within the Organisational Measures taxonomy.

coolharsh55 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2024
- adds `dpv:InformationAudit` to Organisational Measures in DPV
- adds `dpv:Audit` as the parent concept
- adds `dpv:SecurityAudit` and `dpv:LegalComplianeAudit` as audit types

Co-authored-by: Paul Ryan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants