You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We historically have had top/bottom values for vertical-align etc; but in vertical text these don't make a whole lot of sense, since they're on the left or right of the line.
For the <text-edge> values introduced by #10713 , what do we want to do?
Keep text-top and text-bottom, introduce ideographic-top and ideographic-bottom, for consistency.
Keep text-top and text-bottom, introduce ideographic-over and ideographic-under, keeping consistency with existing keywords, but establishing a new pattern going forward.
Use text-over and text-under, breaking consistency with vertical-align; and introduce ideographic-over and ideographic-under.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think ideographic-over/under is better than ideographic-top/bottom. I prefer ideographic-top and ideographic-bottom for consistency with existing text-top and text-bottom keywords, and for similarity with OpenType Baseline Tags such as idtp (ideographic top).
We historically have had top/bottom values for
vertical-align
etc; but in vertical text these don't make a whole lot of sense, since they're on the left or right of the line.For the
<text-edge>
values introduced by #10713 , what do we want to do?text-top
andtext-bottom
, introduceideographic-top
andideographic-bottom
, for consistency.text-top
andtext-bottom
, introduceideographic-over
andideographic-under
, keeping consistency with existing keywords, but establishing a new pattern going forward.text-over
andtext-under
, breaking consistency withvertical-align
; and introduceideographic-over
andideographic-under
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: