-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
technofossils.html
638 lines (614 loc) · 58.9 KB
/
technofossils.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
</head>
<body>
<div id="EssayTitle">
<h1>The Technofossil Record: Where Archaeology and Paleontology Meet</h1>
<h2>
Jan Zalasiewicz, Peter K. Haff, Matthew Edgeworth, Juliana Ivar do Sul, Daniel Richter
</h2>
</div>
<div id="EssayBody" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
<!-- The vocabulary referenced via the prefix "ac" doesn't exist yet. The URI given here is a placeholder. -->
<h3>
The emergence of technofossils
</h3>
<p id="P1" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
Technofossils—human-made artifacts that can become part of Earth’s far-future geology[note]Jan Zalasiewicz, Mark Williams, Colin Waters, Anthony D. Barnosky, and Peter Haff, “The Technofossil Record of Humans,” <em>The Anthropocene Review</em>, vol. 1 (2014): 34–43, <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019613514953?journalCode=anra">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2053019613514953?journalCode=anra</a>.[/note]—have long existed, reaching back to <!-- Tool use year from https://www.mpg.de/research/oldest-evidence-human-stone-tool-use -->
<span resource="#technofossil_earliest" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#technosphere_growth" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#concrete_first_half" />
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-2497978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="2.5 million years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="1" />
<meta property="ac:label" content="Earliest human-ancestor tools" />
the flint and bone tools of our distant ancestors.
</span>
Over time, they have become more abundant and sophisticated, as shown by the archaeological record. And,
<span resource="#technofossil_acceleration" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#great_acceleration" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#humans_technofossil_process" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_spike" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#plastic_bag_fossilization" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#modern_world" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#plastic_implements" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Mid-century technofossil proliferation" />
since the mid-twentieth century, technofossils have gone through a phase of
particularly explosive growth in abundance and diversity
</span>
, many being made of novel materials such as plastics. With a mass now exceeding that of all of Earth’s living organisms,[note]Emily Elhacham, Liad Ben-Uri, Jonathan Grozovski, Yinon M. Bar-On, and Ron Milo, “Global Human-made Mass Now Exceeds all Living Biomass,” <em>Nature</em>, vol. 588 (2020): pp. 442–444, <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-3010-5">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-3010-5</a>.[/note] technofossils have become a planetary presence that we must better understand and deal with. The rivalry between the living and constructed realms goes well beyond a kind of face-off in mass equivalence: it becomes a war with many casualties, and the living side bears the brunt of it.
</p>
<p id="P2" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
To understand the phenomenon of technofossils, we need to go further back in time to set the framework (or multiple frameworks). The very word “technofossil” is a reframing of the venerable term “artifact” to emphasize that many of these objects will enter the fossil record, and may be used—in the near or far future—like the traditional zone fossils, such as
<span resource="#trilobites" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#paleontology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-520997978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="521 million years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="1" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-251897978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="251.9 million years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="1" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Trilobite temporal range" />
<!-- trilobites dates 521–251.9 Ma source: https://doi.org 10.1666%2F0022-3360%282002%29076%3C0692%3APAOSBE%3E2.0.CO%3B2 -->trilobites
</span>
and
<span resource="#ammonites" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#paleontology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-408997978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="409 million years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-64997978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="65 million years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Ammonite temporal range" />
<!-- Ammonite dates 409–65 Ma source: https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-94-017-9633-0_19 -->ammonites
</span>
, that
<span resource="#paleontology" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#trilobites" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#ammonites" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#jellyfish_fossil" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#holocene" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#pleistocene" />
<meta property="ac:label" content="Paleontology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1800" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="19th century" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
<!-- Source for beginning of archeology date https://www.britannica.com/science/paleontology-->paleontologists
</span>
use to age-date strata. Moreover, as these objects enter the fossil record, one can bring the dark arts of taphonomy to bear, forward-modeling how, and in what form, these objects will survive within strata over geological timescales. This, though, is not a simple exercise in telling catchy stories of the far future. The very act of fossilization means passing through, and interacting with, the living, sensitive “critical zone” that surrounds our planet. A plastic bag, for instance, might ultimately
<span resource="#plastic_bag" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#plastic_bag_fossilization" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#jellyfish_fossil" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1965" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1965" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="5002022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="A few million years from now" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="1" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Plastic bag resemblance to Cambrian jellyfish" />
form a complex flattened impression in a bed of shale
</span>
, reminiscent of (say) some exquisitely preserved
<span resource="#jellyfish_fossil" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#paleontology" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#plastic_bag" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content=" -540997978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="540 million years ago" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-485397978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="485.4 million years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="1" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Cambrian jellyfish fossil origins" />
<!-- Cambrian dates 541.0 ± 1.0 – 485.4 ± 1.9 Ma source: http://www.stratigraphy.org/index.php/ics-chart-timescale -->jellyfish from Cambrian times
</span>
. But, in passing from the surface to its ultimate burial, the bag may have choked a seagull, trapped some marine worms on the sea floor and, as a novel barrier to water and oxygen, formed different microbial micro-communities on its lower and upper surfaces that would react differently to the conditions of ever-deeper burial—before that subterranean life eventually winks out,
<span resource="#plastic_bag_fossilization" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_acceleration" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#plastic_bag" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Now" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2002022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Millions of years later" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="1" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="A plastic bag's fossilization" />
millions of years later
</span>
, several hundred meters below the sea floor. Technofossilization is therefore an active process, making its own living winners and losers in the critical zone. The process is complicated further in that humans not only manufacture complex objects, but
<span resource="#humans_technofossil_process" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#technofossil_acceleration" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#plastic_bag_fossilization" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Humans assist in fossilization process itself" />
assist in the fossilization process itself
</span>
, for instance by emplacing such objects within tunnels and boreholes.
</p>
<h3>
A taxonomy for the archaeosphere
</h3>
<p id="P3" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
There are other perspectives that can be explored—that need, indeed, to be explored. Technofossils, that concept devised to encourage paleontological/geological analysis of our manufactured constructions, are still artifacts, and remain both central to and representative of the “material culture” of the
<span resource="#archeology" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#archeology_focus_on_modern_world" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#troy" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#pompeii" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#angkor_wat" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#pottery_shard" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#concrete_first_half" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1700" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="18th century" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
<!-- Source for beginning of archeology date https://www.britannica.com/science/archaeology--> discipline of archaeology
</span>
. Here, the contrasts in methodological, analytical, and philosophical approaches between archaeology and paleontology might be fruitfully explored, with the aim of encouraging cross-collaborative discussions which would help us understand this enormous and rapidly evolving phenomenon. Archaeology has a long tradition and practice of collecting, classifying, interpreting, and curating artifacts of all kinds, a tradition almost entirely lacking in geology (except when collaborating—with archaeologists, naturally—on <!-- Pleistocene and Holcene dates source: http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2020-01.pdf note I am using indefiniteness per the uncertainty interval provided by the chart-->
<span resource="#pleistocene" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#paleontology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content=" -2577978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="2.58 million years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.6" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-9678" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="11,700 years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
Pleistocene
</span>
and
<span resource="#holocene" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#paleontology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content=" -9628" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content=" 11,650 years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
Holocene
</span>
strata). This knowledge and experience could usefully inform a paleontologist’s approach, whose natural reflex might be to try out Linnaean biological classification on technofossils, placing (for example) a Bic Cristal ballpoint pen species within a (large and diverse) ballpoint pen genus, within a family of pens (including fountain and felt tip pens), within an order of writing implements (in which pencils and crayons might be located), all these being within a phylum of communicative technology (which could inspire fierce discussions over whether or not it would include computers and televisions). Such an approach would be fascinating, if prone to being instantly overwhelmed by the huge scale and explosive growth of technodiversity—not to mention the cumbersome processes of biological taxonomy, which demands the formal selection of type specimens and the involvement of committees in nomenclatural changes for individual species. Taxonomic systems, however, reflect evolutionary patterns, and technofossil evolution differs from biological evolution, as we discuss below.
</p>
<p id="P4" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
The archaeologists’ experience and traditions with this kind of material provide an alternative and complementary platform for coping with this challenge. And archaeology, while traditionally tasked with exploring the human world of the past—from ancient times prior to literacy up to historical times—now looks increasingly at <!-- had previously thought about tagging "archeology" also—thoughts? -->
<span resource="#great_acceleration" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#technofossil_acceleration" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#archeology_focus_on_modern_world" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#anthropocene" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#concrete_second_half" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Now" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Great Acceleration" />
the contemporary past
</span>
, when the scale, speed, and nature of anthropogenic change accelerated. This
focus has led to pioneering archaeologically-based or -influenced
<span resource="#archeology_focus_on_modern_world" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#archeology" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#great_acceleration" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#anthropocene_strata" />
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="2022" />
<meta property="ac:label" content="Archeology studies of contemporary material culture" />
studies of contemporary “material culture”
</span>
—for example, the analysis of the kinds of waste accumulating in landfill sites suggests that
<span resource="#modern_world" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_acceleration" />
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Now" />
<meta property="ac:label" content="Today's accumulating waste" />
the modern, still-functioning world
</span>
may be put under the same kind of microscope as in the studies of, say,
<span resource="#troy" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#archeology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-3550" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="3,500-3,600 BCE" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="500" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="500 CE" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
Troy
</span>
,
<span resource="#pompeii" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#archeology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-600" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="7th or 6th century BCE" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="79" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="79 CE" />
</span>
Pompeii
</span>
, or
<span resource="#angkor_wat" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#archeology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1125" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Between 1113–1150" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1550" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1500s" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
Angkor Wat
</span>
. Geological studies also interpret modern waste and debris—but mostly on a large and relatively crude scale, where they are treated as sedimentary units to be mapped out, and their general properties assessed. Attempts to deal with the fine, technopaleontological detail contained within these deposits are just beginning, specifically as attempts to link waste and debris with still-functional constructions in same way that fossils are routinely compared with modern biological organisms. There is enormous potential to understand this phenomenon better in these kinds of ways—even as our contemporary material culture continues to grow and evolve around us.
</p>
<p id="P5" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
Archaeologists traditionally deal with technofossils made of novel materials—pottery, glass, concrete, brick, tile, and now increasingly plastics and other modern materials—which are commonly found as inclusions in archaeological strata. These are used to date and correlate layers and features in ways broadly analogous with how geologists use fossils of natural organisms. However, methods of stratigraphic analysis have to be adjusted somewhat to take into account important differences between technofossils and “natural” fossils. An obvious point is that whereas the evolution of biological organisms is determined by natural selection acting upon the physical expression of genetic coding, technofossils are subject to cultural selection pressures and only indirectly to forces of natural selection. This can lead to significant differences between their patterns of distribution in the stratigraphic record. Another difference is that the processes of fossilization through which the remains of natural organisms get to be preserved in strata might, in classical geology, be considered entirely natural. However, in the case of technofossils, these processes may be technological as well, with questions of the intentional design or cultural style coming into play. A brick is a good example: first made from clay molded into a required shape and heated in a brick kiln, it spends its useful life in the functioning technosphere as part of a structure, and afterwards it might end up in urban archaeosphere layers of accumulated occupation debris and building rubble, or be deposited back in the ground as landfill. The brick does not need to wait millions of years for geological processes of lithification (hardening) to occur: It has already been turned to stone, in a kiln rather than in sedimentary settings, with a strong potential for long-term preservation as a fossil on geological timescales. Thus even its entry into stratigraphic contexts is culturally and technologically mediated.
</p>
<p id="P6" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
Archaeological methodologies have evolved to deal specifically with such objects and materials, and take due account of the factors described above. Typologies and seriation charts used for pottery can be adapted for use with other novel materials, such as plastics. Of particular consideration is the technofossil within its stratigraphic context. The information it can convey is—as with fossils in ancient strata—multiplied many times by taking into consideration the total assemblage of technofossils and novel materials along with other environmental evidence, such as animal bones found together in a particular layer, and the position of that layer within a broader stratigraphic sequence of archaeological cuts and deposits. The technofossil has potential to reveal information not only about itself and its own mode of manufacture or use, or about the layer within which it was found, but also about larger structures and features in the archaeological record. A single technofossil or novel material such as a fragment of pottery (which can be dated by reference to similar pottery found in other correlatable contexts)—if it is found beneath a wall or in a layer cut by building foundation trenches—can help to date the whole building or complex of buildings (just as a single trilobite fragment can date a stratal succession to a precise level in the Palaeozoic) and at wider levels, provide information on patterns of trade.
</p>
<h3>
Technostratigraphy in the Anthropocene
</h3>
<p id="P7" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
There is a difference though, in scale if not fundamentally, between the
<span resource="#pottery_shard" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#archeology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-3000" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Thousands of years" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.6" />
</span>
pottery shards of thousands-year-old civilizations
</span>
and, say,
<span resource="#plastic_bag" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
modern polyethylene bags
</span>
, ballpoint pens, and the plastic shafts of cotton swabs. Those pottery relics provide marvelous time constraints, which can typically date the cultural evolution of particular local civilizations, together with those that they interacted with along evolving trading routes. The timescale produced is a patchwork of local to regional ones, that one correlates as best as one can, usually with the help of numerical proxies such as radiocarbon dates.
<span resource="#plastic_implements" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:label" content="Modern plastic implements spread around the world" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_acceleration" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#plastic_fiber" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#ocean_plastic_layer" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1965" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1960s" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
Modern plastic implements
</span>
, invented only decades ago, have spread around the world with astonishing speed, first along modern global trade networks, and then once they were discarded, scattered by wind, flowing river waters, and ocean currents—and within the bodies of animals that had eaten them—to become truly global temporal markers. Some, like the
<span resource="#plastic_fiber" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:label" content="Plastic fiber abundance" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#microtechnofossils" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#plastic_implements" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1980" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
plastic fibers discarded from modern clothing
</span>
, are so abundant that they have become a key signal, routinely sought (as “micro-technofossils”) in the core specimens being analyzed as potential candidates for the Anthropocene “golden spike.” One might consider the
<span resource="#fly_ash_particle" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#microtechnofossils" />
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Now" />
<meta property="ac:label" content="Analysis of fly ash particles" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
fly ash particles
</span>
also routinely analyzed for the same purpose as another
<span resource="#microtechnofossils" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:label" content="Microtechnofossils studied as signal for Anthropocene" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#plastic_fiber" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#fly_ash_particle" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
“micro-technofossil,”
</span>
as they, too, are the byproducts of an industrial process.
</p>
<p id="P8" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
Most technofossils provide very fine dating resolution, not only for identifying the
<span resource="#anthropocene" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#great_acceleration" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#anthropocene_strata" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_spike2" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#updated_protocols" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950s" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
Anthropocene
</span>
, but also to signal a discrete level within it. Among the modern polymers which are produced and consequently discarded in large amounts around the globe, one might consider, for instance, those under the polyethylene (PE) umbrella: there are dozens of polymer types (LDPE, HDPE and many others) that have been invented within decadal timespans and might represent
<span resource="#anthropocene_strata" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#anthropocene" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#archeology_focus_on_modern_world" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#pet_bottles" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#credit_card" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#bic_pen" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#compact_discs" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950s" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
fine-scale chemostratigraphical markers within Anthropocene strata.
</span>
<span resource="#pet_bottles" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#anthropocene_strata" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1973" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1973" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Plastic bottles" />
PET (polyethylene terephthalate) bottles
</span>
, now ubiquitous, were first produced in 1973, and so date what one might now term the mid- to late Anthropocene. Of course the patterns into which plastics have been shaped infinitely multiply the dating possibilities.
<span resource="#credit_card" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#anthropocene_strata" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Plastic credit cards" />
The plastic credit card
</span>
and
<span resource="#bic_pen" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#anthropocene_strata" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Bic ballpoint pens" />
the Bic Cristal ballpoint pen
</span>
, for instance, both first produced in 1950, may be regarded as zone technofossils for the Anthropocene, while
<span resource="#compact_discs" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#anthropocene_strata" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1982" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1982" />
</span>
compact discs
</span>
(surprisingly widely dispersed as trash) only date from 1982. The technostratigraphic possibilities are almost endless, as technodiversity (if measured as the number of specific kinds of technofossil) is now far greater than biodiversity, measured as the number of species.[note]Jan Zalasiewicz, Mark Williams, Colin Waters, Anthony D. Barnosky, John Palmesino, Ann-Sofi Rönnskog, Matt Edgeworth, Cath Neal, Alejandro Cearreta, Erle Ellis, Jacques Grinevald, Peter Haff, Juliana A. Ivar do Sul, Catherine Jeandel, Reinhold Leinfelder, John R. McNeill, Eric Odada, Naomi Oreskes, Simon James Price, Andrew Revkin, Will Steffen, Colin Summerhayes, Davor Vidas, Scott Wing, and Alexander P. Wolfe, “Scale and Diversity of the Physical Technosphere: A Geological Perspective,” <em>The Anthropocene Review</em>, vol. 4 (2017): pp. 9–22, <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053019616677743">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053019616677743</a>.[/note] The larger technofossils are not quite as ubiquitously distributed, of course—but then paleontological macrofossils such as ammonites and trilobites are also not as ubiquitous in strata as are microfossils such as fossil pollen and micro-algal sporecases; indeed, many macrofossils are rare, and yet they are avidly sought by paleontologists for their great value as markers of geological time. One may expect similar utility for technofossils, both small and large, once efforts to seriously map and classify Anthropocene strata get under way.
</p>
<h3>
Technofossils and the evolution of information
</h3>
<p id="P9" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
Technofossils, and the new materials of their construction, are just the residue of a process—or rather, of many variably interlinked processes and forces: supply chains, investment hubs, research institutes, factories, courts of law, pubs, power stations, football stadiums, prisons, advertising agencies, army barracks, farms, across the garden fence, and in other countless and diverse nodes of human influence and action that combine within the technosphere. In the same way, biofossils are the residue of a network of interlinked biological and geological processes that, together, define the biosphere and underpin its actions.
</p>
<p id="P10" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
One way of tying together the stratigraphic classification of objects as different as biofossils and technofossils is to take advantage of the fact that both indirectly record steps in the evolution of knowledge. The role of knowledge merits attention because it plays a central role in the appearance of technology, and thus in the emergence of the technosphere from the biosphere.[note]Jürgen Renn, <em>The Evolution of Knowledge: Rethinking Science for the Anthropocene</em>. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.[/note] Knowledge can be understood as information that has causal effect, and that has the potential to evolve by transforming itself and its environment in a way favorable to its own survival.[note]David Deutsch,<em>The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations that Transform the World</em>. New York: Viking, 2011.[/note] This physical definition applies to information in DNA, which propagates according to Darwinian mechanisms and, in the process, helps construct its immediate environment (the organism itself) and alter its surroundings (niche construction) in a manner that enhances its own survivability. One of the products of the evolution of non-cognitive genetic knowledge was the human brain, an organ able to create and store causal information in patterns of neural synapses. Lacking the Darwinian constraint to replicate itself accurately, such human cognitive knowledge was able to evolve and impact the world in a way relatively unconstrained by biology.
</p>
<p id="P11" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
The escape of knowledge from biological control created in its wake a new force in Earth history: technology. The resulting flood of technological artifacts with their information-rich patterns of form, composition, and connectivity initiated yet again a new cycle of knowledge creation, i.e., the knowledge embedded in technology. This process resulted in human-technological networks, patchy and widely scattered at first, that grew and merged to produce,
<span resource="#technosphere_growth" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_earliest" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#technofossil_spike" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1875" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Late 18th century" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Mid-20th century" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Early technosphere" />
by the late eighteenth century, a new, globally integrated Earth system.[note]John R. McNeill and William H. McNeill, <em>The Human Web: A Bird’s-Eye View of World History</em>. New York: Norton and Company, 2003.[/note]
</span>
This system constitutes the technosphere, where “sphere” indicates the presence of many qualities common to the classical Earth spheres, i.e., the atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere.[note]Peter K. Haff, “Technology as a Geological Phenomenon: Implications for Human Well-being,” in <em>A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene</em>, eds. Colin N. Waters, Jan Zalasiewicz, Mark Williams, Michael. A. Ellis, and Andrea Marie Snelling. London: Geological Society, Special Publications, vol. 395, 2014: pp. 301–309.[/note] The production and deposition of chemical, particulate, and artifactual waste by the technosphere, including many novel forms,
<span resource="#technofossil_spike" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technosphere_growth" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#technofossil_spike2" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#technofossil_acceleration" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#novelmaterials_increase" />
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Mid-20th century" />
<meta property="ac:label" content="Technofossil spike" />
accelerated markedly from the mid-twentieth century onwards
</span>
, giving rise to unique, preservable, and globally distributed technofossil assemblages.
<span resource="#technofossil_spike2" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_spike" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#anthropocene" />
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950s" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
<meta property="ac:label" content="Stratigraphic Anthropocene beginning" />
These help allow practical recognition of the Anthropocene within recent strata.
</span>
</p>
<p id="P12" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
The characteristic entities of the technosphere and biosphere, i.e., artifacts and organisms, can serve as durable proxies for the underlying technological and biological information they contain as they provide the raw material for fossilization. Changes in organismal information, transmitted between generations via Darwinian evolution, most commonly result in only incremental differences in organismal body design. Although DNA information tends to fade with time after an individual organism dies, corresponding structural information can persist in the architecture of biofossils. Where the resulting biofossil record is locally non-incremental, one may infer that the discontinuity is due to causes such as erosion, rather than to a sudden change in organismal design.
</p>
<p id="P13" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
In contrast, technological artifacts, enabled by the fluidity of information freed from the chemical bondage of DNA, can evolve rapidly in giant Lamarckian-like steps, leaving a technofossil record marked by discontinuities that reflect the saltatory nature of technological change. As a consequence of these jumps in design, the resulting technofossils cannot be relied on to carry with them intrinsic evidence of their temporal relationship to earlier technofossils. Information missing from the technofossil record must be provided from an independent but correlatable data repository. Such an external record, as compiled for example from archaeological findings and the history of technology and science, offers a stand-in for the continuity that characterizes biological change. The required external record, residing for example in the cultural knowledge in books, universities, and museums, and in the cognitive knowledge in the brains of living scientists and historians, is a product of the technosphere. Thus the evolution of technological knowledge, in addition to generating a cryptic sequence of technofossils, also provides, in a continuously updated form, the key to deciphering the technofossil text. This makes it possible to avoid ad hoc organizational schemes for the classification of technofossils, such as those based on form or inferred function, and instead to adopt a cladistics approach similar to that in biology, i.e., an ordering system that respects the causal chain connecting successive generations of technology.
</p>
<p id="P14" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
The necessity of relying on cultural information for understanding technofossils is not a sign that technofossils should be unacceptable as part of the geological record. Indeed, biofossil classification is similarly dependent on knowledge residing in the technosphere. The extension to technofossils simply reflects the fact that in the Anthropocene, cognitive and cultural knowledge has influenced planetary dynamics sufficiently rapidly and profoundly to
<span resource="#updated_protocols" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#anthropocene" />
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Now" />
<meta property="ac:label" content="Required updated stratigraphic charts and protocols" />
require updated stratigraphic charts and protocols.
</span>
This points to the fact that stratigraphy must be a living, growing science if it is to keep up with the pace of planetary change.
</p>
<h3>
Human-led mineral evolution, concrete, metals and the plastics connection
</h3>
<p id="P15" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
The novel materials used in these constructed objects are as astonishingly hyper-diverse as the objects themselves. That the number of types of inorganic crystalline compounds—minerals in all but formal classification—multiplied forty-fold over a figure that had
<span resource="#novelmaterials_pre_anthropocene" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-2500000000" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="2.5 billion years ago" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Mid-20th century" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Stable number of minerals on Earth" />
held more or less steady for two and a half billion years
</span>
is impressive enough. The mineralogist Bob Hazen and his colleagues have both beautifully set out the geologically slow pace of mineral evolution on Earth,[note]Robert M. Hazen, Dominic Papineau, Wouter Bleeker, Robert T. Downs, John M. Ferry, Timothy J. McCoy, Dimitri A. Sverjensky, and Hexiong Yang “Mineral Evolution,” <em>American Mineralogist</em>, vol. 93 (2008): pp. 1693–1720, <a href="https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article-abstract/93/11-12/1693/44643/Mineral-evolution?redirectedFrom=fulltext">https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article-abstract/93/11-12/1693/44643/Mineral-evolution?redirectedFrom=fulltext</a>.[/note] and then detailed its late but strikingly impressive human addition.[note]Robert M. Hazen, Edward S. Grew, Marcus J. Origlieri, and Robert T. Downs, “On the Mineralogy of the ‘Anthropocene Epoch’,” <em>American Mineralogist</em>, vol. 102, (2017): 595–611, <a href="https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article-abstract/102/3/595/277982/On-the-mineralogy-of-the-Anthropocene-Epoch?redirectedFrom=fulltext">https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article-abstract/102/3/595/277982/On-the-mineralogy-of-the-Anthropocene-Epoch?redirectedFrom=fulltext</a>.[/note] To have nearly all of that novel,
<span resource="#novelmaterials_increase" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_spike" />
<meta property="ac:linksTo" resource="#concrete_second_half" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1952" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1952" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Present" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="40-fold anthropogenic increase in mineral variety" />
human-driven diversification taking place in the last 70 years
</span>
seems surreal, like something out of science-fiction.[note]Jaia Syvitski, Colin N. Waters, John Day, John D. Milliman, Colin Summerhayes, Will Steffen, Jan Zalasiewicz, Alejandro Cearreta, Agnieszka Gałuszka, Irka Hajdas, Martin J. Head, Reinhold Leinfelder, J. R. McNeill, Clément Poirier, Neil L. Rose, William Shotyk, Michael Wagreich, and Mark Williams, “Extraordinary Human Energy Consumption and Resultant Geological Impacts Beginning Around 1950 CE Initiated the Proposed Anthropocene Epoch,” <em>Communications Earth & Environment</em>, vol.<em> </em>1, no. 32 (2020): <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-020-00029-y">https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-020-00029-y</a>.[/note] Most of these new compounds are present in tiny amounts, of course—but then, most natural mineral species are extremely rare too; only a few dozen make up the bulk of rocks on Earth.
</p>
<p id="P16" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
However, the mere presence of a novelty may not really count for much in the Earth System, if its effect on that system is slight or benign. The most abundant novel material on Earth, by a wide margin, is
<span resource="#concrete_first_half" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#technofossil_earliest" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#archeology" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-400" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="4th century BCE" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2002" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="2002" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="First 250 million tons of concrete produced" />
concrete
</span>
, at something exceeding half a trillion tons—about half this weight was produced in
<span resource="#concrete_second_half" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#novelmaterials_increase" />
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#great_acceleration" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2002" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="2002" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Present" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Second 250 million tons of concrete produced" />
the last 20 years
</span>
. Yet concrete is a rock, a little like a sandy limestone, generally inert if not altogether non-toxic (through its highly alkaline nature). Large amounts of pure (or alloyed) metals have been brought to Earth’s surface, like iron, copper, and aluminum—the metals themselves are not generally regarded as pollutants (although the separation of these metals from their native ores may be highly polluting). Plastics, though, are something different.[note]Sarah Gabbott, Sarah Key, Catherine Russell, Yasmin Yonan, and Jan Zalasiewicz, “The Geography and Geology of Plastics: Their Environmental Distribution and Fate,” <em>Plastic Waste and Recycling: Environmental Impact, Societal Issues, Prevention and Solutions</em>, ed. Trevor M. Letcher. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2020, pp. 33–36.[/note] Even though they are among the most chemically inert of all of the novel materials, their relative inertness, combined with their strength and lightness, is exactly what makes them so troublesome.
</p>
<p id="P17" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
Plastic bags can be blown like leaves by the wind, reaching places far away from their initial sources. As discussed above, when landing in the soil, bags do not mulch down as leaves do, but just… remain. If buried and out of the reach of UV radiation from the sun, they might stay intact for decades, centuries—or perhaps even longer, even while being disturbed by the action of worms, moles, and percolating water, and slowly shifting their position via soil creep and other mass movement processes. Although this kind of long-term longevity is an open question, current evidence suggests that plastics can be preserved at least within human timescales, and for some perhaps far longer;
<span resource="#amber" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="-319997978" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="320 million years ago" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="1" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="2022" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="Present" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.4" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Oldest amber specimens" />
amber
</span>
, after all, has no problem surviving, buried in strata, on multimillion-year timescales. That is, however, not surprising, because plastics are resistant to most forms of degradation by design. Plastics are manufactured to be durable, and most of the plastics that now migrate between different environmental compartments are not those with long lifecycles, such as machines and vehicles or the fridge in your kitchen, but those with short lifecycles, such as the plastic bag blown away by the wind. If at the surface and attacked by UV radiation, plastics simply fragment into smaller pieces of plastic which can stay there or travel on. In general, the smaller the fragment of plastic, the higher its potential to be transported within and among compartments. This very mobility has allowed microplastics (<5 mm) to become a ubiquitous component of the surface layers of all ocean sediments, even in remote regions or at profound water depths. This means that in all oceans a
<span resource="#ocean_plastic_layer" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<meta property="ac:linkedFrom" resource="#plastic_implements" />
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1970" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1970" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Novel plastic ocean sediment layer" />
plastics-rich sediment layer is forming
</span>
, one that has never occurred before in the entire history of our planet. On land, a large proportion of contemporary agricultural soils is also heavily polluted with microplastics which have been spread through the application of organic compost and sewage sludge. The hyper-rapid evolution in plastic polymer technologies (PET, PP, PVC etc.) can even record decadal shifts in abundance that may date post-1950 sediments, as we have shown above. Some plastics might even be considered extinct.
<span resource="#bakelite" typeof="time:ProperInterval">
<span property="time:hasBeginning" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1909" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1909" />
</span>
<span property="time:hasEnd" typeof="time:Instant">
<meta property="time:inXSDgYear" content="1950" />
<meta property="rdfs:label" content="1950s" />
<meta property="ac:hasIndefiniteness" content="0.2" />
</span>
<meta property="ac:label" content="Bakelite production" />
Bakelite
</span>
, for instance, may be considered an ancient polymer type, as it is more than a century old, and its current production rates are negligible when compared to
more modern polymers.
</p>
<p id="P18" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
It is hard to think of a geological equivalent, physically or chemically, for plastics. As larger fragments, amber and related solid hydrocarbons come close, but they are too rare to have wider environmental impacts. The tough natural polymer coats of pollen and spores could make good analogues for microplastics, but millions of years of evolution has enabled biological digestion processes to evolve which can break down these materials—not least by honeybees, which can use pollen as a primary food source (one, these days, sometimes hijacked by health-conscious humans). One might have to go to other planetary bodies to find analogues for abundant, undigested polymerized hydrocarbons at the surface—such as Saturn’s moon, Titan, where such solid particles are thought to make up the spectacular wind-blown dunefields there. In many ways, plastics are an alien material for Earth, and developing an effective conceptual framework for plastics is one of the challenges they present us in the Anthropocene.
</p>
<h3>
A technosphere in overdrive
</h3>
<p id="P19" prefix="time: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ac: http://anthropocene-curriculum.org/tbd rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
Technofossils, whether of plastic or of other materials, are at a stage of development that gives much food for thought. Their ever-faster increases in bulk and sophistication, as a key component of a technosphere in overdrive, take place largely at the expense of a diminishing biosphere, amid a heating climate and rising sea levels that may be also counted as spin-offs of the technosphere’s construction. Will that furious evolution continue, as new forms spring up to help their parent humans cope with, and perhaps ameliorate, an increasingly perilous environment in this new kind of arms race? Or will the technosphere, and its cornucopia of material inventions, be choked off as its biological foundations give way underneath it? Or might technofossils even dispense with their biological foundations to become wholly silicon-based, sustaining themselves on a Hothouse Earth inimical to complex organic life? That last option still seems a little out of reach, but one never knows. In whatever form, this story looks like it will still develop some fascinating, if not always comforting, chapters.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>