Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add hdf5 dumpreader for PIConGPU #32

Open
2 of 5 tasks
skuschel opened this issue Jun 15, 2015 · 4 comments
Open
2 of 5 tasks

add hdf5 dumpreader for PIConGPU #32

skuschel opened this issue Jun 15, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement low priority reader specific change is affecting a specific reader class

Comments

@skuschel
Copy link
Owner

cc @stetie @ax3l

@skuschel skuschel added this to the v0.2 milestone Jun 15, 2015
@skuschel skuschel added enhancement reader specific change is affecting a specific reader class labels Jun 15, 2015
@skuschel skuschel removed this from the v0.2 milestone Jan 7, 2016
@skuschel
Copy link
Owner Author

skuschel commented Jan 7, 2016

There is draft of its implementations here: https://github.com/skuschel/postpic/tree/picongpureader
@ax3l Do you know when PIConGPU produces OpenPMD conform output, so this becomes entirely obsolete?

@ax3l
Copy link
Contributor

ax3l commented Jan 7, 2016

@skuschel I have a branch open that already implements the base standard and right now gets the particlePatches. It still lacks the ED-PIC extension: https://github.com/ax3l/picongpu/tree/topic-openPMD

The plan is to ship openPMD starting with the next release (freeze in a few weeks, release in ~1-2 month), need to see if this will include ED-PIC already: PIConGPU 0.2.0

@ax3l
Copy link
Contributor

ax3l commented Jan 7, 2016

you will probably still need the simulationreader since that information is not stored in openPMD 1.X

@skuschel
Copy link
Owner Author

skuschel commented Jan 7, 2016

There will be a simulationreader (=time series reader) for OpenPMD anyways. Ok seems good, so its probably worth to just wait until picongpu uses OpenPMD. I will still leave the issue open, till this is done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement low priority reader specific change is affecting a specific reader class
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants