You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No
Describe the solution you'd like
When for instance triggering the "unlock" call, the state of the entity is still "locked" until the next polling interval (e.g., minutes later).
Instead, it would be nice if the integration would assume that the state is "unlocked".
If the call fails for whatever reason, the state would correct it-self after the next polling interval.
Preferably, we get a configuration option to turn "Assume state" on or off.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None
Additional context
n/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
LucasHokerberg
changed the title
Assume state after atriggering action
Assume entity state after triggering a call
Dec 28, 2023
I would assume that if the call is not done by the next poll, the call failed and it make sense to see that e.g., the door is still locked.
Or is it a possibility that a poll runs in parallel with a not finished call? In that case, maybe polls need to be deferred until any running call is done, or the assumed state should not be changed unless there are no running calls.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No
Describe the solution you'd like
When for instance triggering the "unlock" call, the state of the entity is still "locked" until the next polling interval (e.g., minutes later).
Instead, it would be nice if the integration would assume that the state is "unlocked".
If the call fails for whatever reason, the state would correct it-self after the next polling interval.
Preferably, we get a configuration option to turn "Assume state" on or off.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None
Additional context
n/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: