You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a nit, but seems like the thing you brought up the other day, that maybe you'd prefer a better name, is a sentiment some other readers have expressed.
Are you open to a rename?
Perhaps you could call your lang "Wires", or "Arrows", or "ArrowLang", or "Connections", or "MapLang", or "Mapcept" or something.
I've seen language projects before at your size rename easily and almost painlessly, with a reduction in friction of user adoption (easier for people to talk about it when they can pronounce it easier).
Anyway, just a small suggestion.
Readers of the interview are finding nomnoml delightful! Thanks so much for taking the time!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a nit, but seems like the thing you brought up the other day, that maybe you'd prefer a better name, is a sentiment some other readers have expressed.
Are you open to a rename?
Perhaps you could call your lang "Wires", or "Arrows", or "ArrowLang", or "Connections", or "MapLang", or "Mapcept" or something.
I've seen language projects before at your size rename easily and almost painlessly, with a reduction in friction of user adoption (easier for people to talk about it when they can pronounce it easier).
Anyway, just a small suggestion.
Readers of the interview are finding nomnoml delightful! Thanks so much for taking the time!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: