From b0da5a1dfffe306f28ff8387b7781d86b8a2c288 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: geemo <geemo@tutanota.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 20:46:32 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] using u64 instead of &u64 I think this might have been the
 issue but have not tested yet

---
 beacon_node/operation_pool/src/lib.rs | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/beacon_node/operation_pool/src/lib.rs b/beacon_node/operation_pool/src/lib.rs
index 15f5d20b82f..e386429359d 100644
--- a/beacon_node/operation_pool/src/lib.rs
+++ b/beacon_node/operation_pool/src/lib.rs
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ pub enum OpPoolError {
 
 #[derive(Default)]
 pub struct AttestationStats {
-    /// Total number of attestations for all committeees/indices/votes.
+    /// Total number of attestations for all committees/indices/votes.
     pub num_attestations: usize,
     /// Number of unique `AttestationData` attested to.
     pub num_attestation_data: usize,
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ impl<T: EthSpec> OperationPool<T> {
         spec: &'a ChainSpec,
     ) -> Vec<(&CompactAttestationData, CompactIndexedAttestation<T>)> {
         let mut cliqued_atts: Vec<(&CompactAttestationData, CompactIndexedAttestation<T>)> = vec![];
+
         if let Some(AttestationDataMap {
             aggregate_attestations,
             unaggregate_attestations,
@@ -817,8 +818,8 @@ fn is_compatible<T: EthSpec>(
     x: &&CompactIndexedAttestation<T>,
     y: &&CompactIndexedAttestation<T>,
 ) -> bool {
-    let x_attester_set: HashSet<_> = x.attesting_indices.iter().collect();
-    let y_attester_set: HashSet<_> = y.attesting_indices.iter().collect();
+    let x_attester_set: HashSet<u64> = x.attesting_indices.iter().cloned().collect();
+    let y_attester_set: HashSet<u64> = y.attesting_indices.iter().cloned().collect();
     x_attester_set.is_disjoint(&y_attester_set)
 }