We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
ChemBERTa was trained on achiral canonicalized molecules, as evidenced by the achiral canonicalized dataset.
The MoleculeNet fine-tuning datasets in the paper contain chiral molecules. How was this addressed?
Did you canonicalize the chiral molecules to make them achiral canonicalized? What about duplicates? (since there are stereoisomers)
Or, did you just inference on the chiral strings? This would certainly cause some problems.
I didn't see any mention of this in the paper.
Please let me know, Clay
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
ChemBERTa was trained on achiral canonicalized molecules, as evidenced by the achiral canonicalized dataset.
The MoleculeNet fine-tuning datasets in the paper contain chiral molecules. How was this addressed?
Did you canonicalize the chiral molecules to make them achiral canonicalized? What about duplicates? (since there are stereoisomers)
Or, did you just inference on the chiral strings? This would certainly cause some problems.
I didn't see any mention of this in the paper.
Please let me know,
Clay
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: