Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different results between released model and released ply #15

Open
xy-guo opened this issue May 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Different results between released model and released ply #15

xy-guo opened this issue May 9, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@xy-guo
Copy link

xy-guo commented May 9, 2022

I tried to infer and fuse on DTU dataset, but found the predicted results are different from your released ply models.

For example:
Your released point cloud for scan1 (mvsnet001_l3.ply): 26727801 points, fscore 0.191357
Predicted point cloud for scan1: 19405933 points, fscore 0.2162721

When I visualize the two point clouds, the completeness of predicted point cloud is much lower than released point cloud, especially around edges.

My environment:
Fusibile: compiled with cuda 11.4, sm86
Pytorch: 1.8.2+cu111
Python: 3.8.12

Here is my log file for scan1
log.txt

@xy-guo
Copy link
Author

xy-guo commented May 9, 2022

I tried to set align_corners=True for grid_sample, and I got more points (22287197), but still less than 26727801.

@prstrive
Copy link
Owner

Maybe you can try Pytorch1.2.0, cudatoolkit 10.0 and python3.6.

@cainsmile
Copy link

I tried to infer and fuse on DTU dataset, but found the predicted results are different from your released ply models.

For example: Your released point cloud for scan1 (mvsnet001_l3.ply): 26727801 points, fscore 0.191357 Predicted point cloud for scan1: 19405933 points, fscore 0.2162721

When I visualize the two point clouds, the completeness of predicted point cloud is much lower than released point cloud, especially around edges.

My environment: Fusibile: compiled with cuda 11.4, sm86 Pytorch: 1.8.2+cu111 Python: 3.8.12

Here is my log file for scan1 log.txt

Hi, I used gipuma to fuse the depth maps, but I the number I got is only half as the author provided. So if there is any parameters of setting I need to change?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants