Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding the missing test coverage for processing-android #644

Open
ranaaditya opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Adding the missing test coverage for processing-android #644

ranaaditya opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@ranaaditya
Copy link
Member

Currently we don't have any tests written for this project as its really hard and complex to write tests for GLSL shaders and OpenGL-ES programs.

But I think we can write tests at least for Utility functions and other basic APIs.

Resources to learn basics of testing-

JUNIT5 - testing framework for Java and JVM
how to start writing tests for GLSL shaders
Writing tests in Android
Android OpenGL unit testing

What do you think @codeanticode about this ?

@ranaaditya ranaaditya changed the title Adding tests for processing-android Adding the missing test coverage for processing-android Apr 1, 2021
@codeanticode
Copy link
Member

Yes, I think we should have some testing infrastructure for the android mode. This is an area I'm not very experienced though, perhaps you can lead this effort.

@ranaaditya
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, I think we should have some testing infrastructure for the android mode. This is an area I'm not very experienced though, perhaps you can lead this effort.

yes @codeanticode , I was figuring out how can we start writing unit tests for this project and how to design the testing infrastructure so that new contributors can easily catchup our progress.

yeah definitely I will lead the testing phase for android-mode.

Best,
Aditya

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants