You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That's great and it looks like we are almost there. Two main points I see:
Why is the setup different? We try to use identical setups for all solver combinations to make them easier to compare. If possible, we should try to use the OpenFOAM setup from the tutorials. Is this possible? Then we can (just like for the other cases) store the FEniCS-X solver in this repository as long as the adapter is under development. As soon as we have a stable API we can move everything to the tutorials repository.
We should make sure that the results for OpenFOAM-OpenFOAM and OpenFOAM-FEniCS-X are identical. From our reference paper we already have some experience with comparing results for the non-steady case. I think we don't have to change a lot here. You can find the script for comparison here.
An example case is
flow-over-heated-plate-steady-state
, but we could also prepare a variant of the partitioned heat equation for steady state.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: