You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The 'fields' parameter was defined as not required in the OpenAPI schema but the API code will error out if it is not included in the request. (I have updated the schema to require the 'fields' parameter for now so it matches the API functionality.)
It looks like we have a default value selected of: feature_id, time_str, wse, geometry but it is not getting passed to the API Lambda function.
Should the fields parameter be required? Does this subset still make sense or should we default to returning all available data fields?
@cassienickles - "I don't think the fields functionality should be required. To me, it should default to include all fields unless that is overburdensome for performance."
The 'fields' parameter was defined as not required in the OpenAPI schema but the API code will error out if it is not included in the request. (I have updated the schema to require the 'fields' parameter for now so it matches the API functionality.)
It looks like we have a default value selected of: feature_id, time_str, wse, geometry but it is not getting passed to the API Lambda function.
Should the fields parameter be required? Does this subset still make sense or should we default to returning all available data fields?
@cassienickles - "I don't think the fields functionality should be required. To me, it should default to include all fields unless that is overburdensome for performance."
@frankinspace and @torimcd - What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: