You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The problem I've been facing is that if I just parse and build an eml file, without making any change, all the inline images break out - by looking at the content of the generated eml file I noticed that the Content-ID header gets lost in the process. Then I looked at the code and I noticed that during the parse step, the attach ID is stored in the id attribute while during the build step, the id is expected to be found in the cid attribute.
Hi! 👋
Firstly, thanks for your work on this project! 🙂
Today I used patch-package to patch
[email protected]
for the project I'm working on.The problem I've been facing is that if I just parse and build an
eml
file, without making any change, all the inline images break out - by looking at the content of the generatedeml
file I noticed that theContent-ID
header gets lost in the process. Then I looked at the code and I noticed that during theparse
step, the attach ID is stored in theid
attribute while during thebuild
step, theid
is expected to be found in thecid
attribute.Here is the diff that solved my problem:
This issue body was partially generated by patch-package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: