Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EPIC] Training pipeline #120

Open
2 of 4 tasks
Shreyanand opened this issue Dec 8, 2021 · 4 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

[EPIC] Training pipeline #120

Shreyanand opened this issue Dec 8, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
priority Indicates that the issue is a priority and should be fixed asap. productization Indicates that the issue exists to indicate improvements for pipelines, images, trino, superset, etc

Comments

@Shreyanand
Copy link
Member

Shreyanand commented Dec 8, 2021

This issue will be used to track all outstanding tasks required to complete the training pipeline. Demo 2 (issue #58) currently supports inference using pre-trained models. For a complete demo, we should have the training pipeline in place as well.

Issues:

@Shreyanand Shreyanand changed the title Training pipeline [EPIC] [EPIC] Training pipeline May 18, 2022
@JeremyGohBNP
Copy link

@Shreyanand @chauhankaranraj Hello! I hope you enjoyed your days off! I am following up on the training pipeline implementation. How has it been going? Do you need additional info or material? Thanks for the update.

@chauhankaranraj
Copy link
Member

@Shreyanand @chauhankaranraj Hello! I hope you enjoyed your days off! I am following up on the training pipeline implementation. How has it been going? Do you need additional info or material? Thanks for the update.

Hi @JeremyGohBNP, I have opened PRs (#155, #158) for both the training notebooks required in the pipeline, but they haven't been merged yet coz of some recent issues with the CI system. As soon as these are merged, we'll assemble them into a kubeflow pipeline and that would conclude the initial training pipeline implementation.

@JeremyGohBNP
Copy link

Hi @chauhankaranraj! I see that #155 and #158 are now closed (?). Does this mean the issues with the CI system were resolved? Are we now able to assemble the PRs into a training pipeline? Thanks!

@chauhankaranraj
Copy link
Member

Hi @chauhankaranraj! I see that #155 and #158 are now closed (?). Does this mean the issues with the CI system were resolved? Are we now able to assemble the PRs into a training pipeline? Thanks!

Hello @JeremyGohBNP! Yes, #155 just got merged yesterday afternoon. So now we're working on assembling the notebooks in an elyra pipeline :)

@Shreyanand Shreyanand added the productization Indicates that the issue exists to indicate improvements for pipelines, images, trino, superset, etc label Jul 14, 2022
@Shreyanand Shreyanand added the priority Indicates that the issue is a priority and should be fixed asap. label Aug 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority Indicates that the issue is a priority and should be fixed asap. productization Indicates that the issue exists to indicate improvements for pipelines, images, trino, superset, etc
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants