Remove Psono

[matchboxbananasynergy]

This seems like a recommendation that's mostly overshadowed by Bitwarden.

Psono might have some enterprise specific features that Bitwarden may not as of yet, but then again, I don't think that businesses of that scale as the target audience of Privacy Guides.

In the interest of keeping tool recommendations to a minimum, and only recommending tools when there is a clear benefit to our target audience, I would suggest removing Psono from the site.

[ghost]

No reason to list it if it doesn't offer anything over Bitwarden.

[matchboxbananasynergy]

privacyguides/privacyguides.org#1488 (comment)

[dngray]

I'm reluctant to remove this just to de-clutter the page. It is in fact a product which has some UX strengths over Bitwarden.

For a start for small deployments its trivial to deploy the official docker images, whereas with BW you really need to use vaultwarden unless you want to be setting up mssql and all that.

In relation to teams, there's a few things it does do better for example the different authentication/sso stuff and audit logging of your team's passwords. What I think we should do is perhaps be more specific in the description of when this might be a better option.

[jonaharagon]

For a start for small deployments its trivial to deploy the official docker images, whereas with BW you really need to use vaultwarden unless you want to be setting up mssql and all that.

I'm unconvinced this is a real benefit for Psono. Vaultwarden is really the only way you should be self-hosting Bitwarden realistically anyways, which is simple to set up.