WIP: poorly-performing functional example of how to represent the CSV.Spec in opm render

[grokspawn]

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Reviewer Checklist

• Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
• Sufficient unit test coverage
• Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
• Docs updated or added to /docs
• Commit messages sensible and descriptive

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: grokspawn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [grokspawn]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 46.80%. Comparing base (dc23843) to head (cd90195).
Report is 12 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1498      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   48.61%   46.80%   -1.81%     
==========================================
  Files         135      135              
  Lines       12793    15760    +2967     
==========================================
+ Hits         6219     7377    +1158     
- Misses       5533     7342    +1809     
  Partials     1041     1041              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.