Licensing unclear

[eseidel]

pub.dev lists the dcli package as MIT: https://pub.dev/packages/dcli/license

GitHub does not list a license for the repository (presumably because the LICENSE files are not at the top level).
e.g. https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli, compare to https://github.com/flutter/flutter where github clearly notes on the right hand side it's BSD 3-clause.

Various files have "proprietary and confidential" as their header. e.g.
https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli/blob/master/dcli/lib/dcli.dart

Would love clarity on the intended licensing of this repository and the terms under which the code can/can't be used. Thank you!

[bsutton]

The intended licence is mit. I will review the statements in the code base to ensure they agree.

…

On Tue, 6 Dec 2022, 8:06 am Eric Seidel, ***@***.***> wrote: pub.dev lists the dcli package as MIT: https://pub.dev/packages/dcli GitHub does not list a license for the repository (presumably because the LICENSE files are not at the top level). e.g. https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli, compare to https://github.com/flutter/flutter where github clearly notes on the right hand side it's BSD 3-clause. Various files have "proprietary and confidential" as their header. e.g. https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli/blob/master/dcli/lib/dcli.dart Would love clarity on the intended licensing of this repository and the terms under which the code can/can't be used. Thank you! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#210>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG32OECE6SLMQBGXUPYEFDWLZKMJANCNFSM6AAAAAASUXGFEA> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>