Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: optional organization argument to fork, etc. #505

Closed
geoff-nixon opened this issue Mar 3, 2014 · 16 comments
Closed

Feature request: optional organization argument to fork, etc. #505

geoff-nixon opened this issue Mar 3, 2014 · 16 comments

Comments

@geoff-nixon
Copy link

Currently, hub fork and hub pull-request only will create forks in [user]/[repo].

I'd really like to be able to (optionally) fork the project under an [organization]/[repo].

There are a number of reasons why this would make sense, but here's mine: I always put projects for which I'm submitting PRs into an organization I've created for this particular purpose since, well, some people aren't so good at following up on PRs in a timely manner; and I prefer not to clutter up "my" repos with a bunch of forks which need to remain for an indeterminate length of time.

I'd hack on this myself, but for the "hub's gonna go go" business.

@mislav
Copy link
Owner

mislav commented Mar 3, 2014

Good idea. We could support something like:

git fork --org <name>

@mislav mislav added this to the v2.0 milestone Mar 3, 2014
@geoff-nixon
Copy link
Author

Yeah, that would be perfect.

@blackjid
Copy link
Contributor

👍 nice!

@hkdobrev
Copy link

👍

@nathanhaigh
Copy link

This is something I'd love to see too 👍

@fmap
Copy link

fmap commented Jul 26, 2014

👍

1 similar comment
@garrettlancaster
Copy link

👍

@mislav mislav added the feature label Dec 23, 2014
@loupgaroublond
Copy link

+1 but this seems like a bug, not a feature

@sr105
Copy link

sr105 commented Jun 8, 2015

👍

@patcon
Copy link

patcon commented Jul 11, 2015

👍

cc: @mrjcleaver

@geoff-nixon
Copy link
Author

Counting the dup and the naked +1, I believe that makes a full 🙌, does it not?

@rtomayko? @mislav? @bueller?

Or, I could stfu and go get me some effective golang, which is probably what I should be doing anyway.

@mislav
Copy link
Owner

mislav commented Sep 9, 2015

@geoff-codes Here is the line where forking happens. If this feature was to happen, then we should add a configuration option that accepts a name of an org that affects the fork operation.

@zerothi
Copy link

zerothi commented Feb 10, 2016

👍 this feature would be awesome.

Having a fork of a project as a separate code and still being able to do PR across would be very useful.

@olalonde
Copy link

👍

@sjmulder
Copy link

Is anyone working on this? If not I might take a stab at it.

@mislav
Copy link
Owner

mislav commented May 12, 2016

@sjmulder You're welcome to take a stab at it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests