You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think perhaps a better implementation is to use the checkCellRatio function to automatically detect this issue, since it's not something specific to the leading edge when using joined spacing. Maybe add this as a postprocessing step before output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I totally support this approach, I will try and fix this soon. Also, we should ensure that the final number of sampled points is consistent with initial user input, i.e. n=n+2 before popping out the bad surf mesh elements. Right now I am doing it "manually" on my input script. This is relevant when mesh are coarsened for grid convergence, etc.
Yes very good point -- user should receive a mesh with the specified number of points. I think the main problem comes from joinedSpacing -- do you use it much? Maybe we need some sort of smoothing when joining samplings. Eventually, this should be superseded by a curvature refinement approach which should be the recommended method.
I think perhaps a better implementation is to use the checkCellRatio function to automatically detect this issue, since it's not something specific to the leading edge when using joined spacing. Maybe add this as a postprocessing step before output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: