You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering why we need double grid here. And I saw there's a lot of margins set to be 1.5 leadings or 0.5 leading. Why not just use integer number of leadings to ensure all the elements are aligned with the 1 leading grid?
A quick idea: is it possible to set dynamic margins? Let's say if an element's line height is set to 1.5 leadings with 1 leading bottom margin, and it gets 3 lines at total. For this case, we can make bottom margin as 1.5 leadings then the total height of this module (including element height and bottom margin) can be 6 leadings which won't break the 1 leading grid rules.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@imyujie it's just something that helps with flexibility when it comes to layout. Headings for example usually need a smaller line-height and using the .5 grid allows that, and they don't break the grid. You could disable the double grid and stick to whole leading units only.
Just came across this interesting project and tried https://matejlatin.github.io/Gutenberg/.
I was wondering why we need double grid here. And I saw there's a lot of margins set to be 1.5 leadings or 0.5 leading. Why not just use integer number of leadings to ensure all the elements are aligned with the 1 leading grid?
A quick idea: is it possible to set dynamic margins? Let's say if an element's line height is set to 1.5 leadings with 1 leading bottom margin, and it gets 3 lines at total. For this case, we can make bottom margin as 1.5 leadings then the total height of this module (including element height and bottom margin) can be 6 leadings which won't break the 1 leading grid rules.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: