We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In order to simplify usage, I would be good to be able to do:
@WiremockResolver.Wiremock(factory = FooConfig::class) annotation class FooServer
And use it like this:
fun `test 1`(@FooServer foo: WireMockServer) {}
This is simpler than doing this on every test by importing and declarating the config on each test.
fun `test 2`(@Wiremock(factory = FooConfig::class) foo: WireMockServer) {}
This could be linked to the #9 to support configuration by custom annotation which access an external context to do its config by itself.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
In order to simplify usage, I would be good to be able to do:
And use it like this:
This is simpler than doing this on every test by importing and declarating the config on each test.
This could be linked to the #9 to support configuration by custom annotation which access an external context to do its config by itself.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: